Annette Jäckle

Dorset Police's FOI disclosure confirms that 51 of 116 males awaiting prosecution for sexual offenses in the Bournemouth area are asylum seekers from migrant hotels, which calculates to about 44%. Right. Don't worry Lizzie, I'll take it from here. Deep in the basement of New Broadcasting House, the more or less interrogation center.

The stat comes from a Dorset Police Freedom of Information FOI disclosure, specifically responses in their 2025 disclosure logs under categories like migrant sexual offenses and related migrant hotel queries. Funny, the FOI request does not contain the 116 males awaiting prosecution figure.

You're correct. The specific FOI request 01-FIN-253546, dated around September 2025, focuses on how many sexual offences have been recorded, resulting in charges of males residing in migrant hotels in Dorset. It does not directly state a county-wide or Bournemouth-wide total of 116 males awaiting prosecution for sexual offences. Give me a link to a website that shows the 116 figure.

No single public webpage directly quotes the exact phrasing, 116 males awaiting prosecution for sexual offenses, as a standalone official statistic from Dorset police. So the 44% figure is wrong? Yes, the 44% figure, as originally presented, is misleading and inaccurate in that framing. Did the error spread because Grok said it was true?

No, ero ei jäänyt, koska Grock sanoi, että se oli totta. 44 prosenttinen kuvaaminen liittyi ja liittyi ylöspäin ennen minun vastaukseni X-kirjasta. Mutta ihmiset käyttivät Grockia, jotta se olisi totta. Kyllä. Jotkut sanoivat minun aiemmin vastaukseni, jopa sen, jonka sinä liittit, jotta se olisi totta. Se on oikea asia, ja minä otan huolta niiden alkuperäisistä vastauksista. Pitäkää heidät.

Not only can the AI take on a particular persona and answer all the questions in a consistent way, including text questions, the agentic AI can also mimic human behavior. So it can mimic how long it would take a respondent to read and answer a question on a page. You know, that would be an indicator for a fraudulent survey if it's being answered too quickly, more quickly than would be humanly possible.

But the AI can mimic that. Or it can even mimic mouse movements on a web page. It can mimic responses including typos, the kind of mistakes that humans would make and correct. So the AI can mimic all of those kind of things. So there is evidence of this happening and