Anonymous

He might have slipped under it, he said, but he never noticed it. When pressed on why he hadn't called for help or come forward sooner, Lin said he was paralysed by fear and hoped the situation would blow over. He admitted his actions destroyed his career and family, but remained adamant he was not guilty of murder, saying, I'm guilty of other things, but not murder.

He might have slipped under it, he said, but he never noticed it. When pressed on why he hadn't called for help or come forward sooner, Lin said he was paralysed by fear and hoped the situation would blow over. He admitted his actions destroyed his career and family, but remained adamant he was not guilty of murder, saying, I'm guilty of other things, but not murder.

During closing arguments, the prosecution pointed out that Lynn had more than a year to construct a story for the day he was finally caught, and that he had practiced it so often that he repeated the story almost word for word over two days of police interviews. The accused's story is indeed a series of very unfortunate events, the prosecution said. It is also a complete fiction.

During closing arguments, the prosecution pointed out that Lynn had more than a year to construct a story for the day he was finally caught, and that he had practiced it so often that he repeated the story almost word for word over two days of police interviews. The accused's story is indeed a series of very unfortunate events, the prosecution said. It is also a complete fiction.

During closing arguments, the prosecution pointed out that Lynn had more than a year to construct a story for the day he was finally caught, and that he had practiced it so often that he repeated the story almost word for word over two days of police interviews. The accused's story is indeed a series of very unfortunate events, the prosecution said. It is also a complete fiction.

you can and should readily reject it beyond reasonable doubt. The defence countered with a scathing critique of the prosecution's case, labelling it a shambles. They highlighted 17 perceived flaws in the prosecution's evidence, including failures to address key questions and inconsistencies in witness testimony.

you can and should readily reject it beyond reasonable doubt. The defence countered with a scathing critique of the prosecution's case, labelling it a shambles. They highlighted 17 perceived flaws in the prosecution's evidence, including failures to address key questions and inconsistencies in witness testimony.

you can and should readily reject it beyond reasonable doubt. The defence countered with a scathing critique of the prosecution's case, labelling it a shambles. They highlighted 17 perceived flaws in the prosecution's evidence, including failures to address key questions and inconsistencies in witness testimony.

Before the jury left to deliberate, the judge reiterated key legal principles, the presumption of innocence, the prosecution's burden of proof, and the need to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Manslaughter was not an option as the prosecution had only set out to prove that Lynn had consciously, voluntarily, and deliberately caused the deaths of Russell and Carroll.

Before the jury left to deliberate, the judge reiterated key legal principles, the presumption of innocence, the prosecution's burden of proof, and the need to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Manslaughter was not an option as the prosecution had only set out to prove that Lynn had consciously, voluntarily, and deliberately caused the deaths of Russell and Carroll.

Before the jury left to deliberate, the judge reiterated key legal principles, the presumption of innocence, the prosecution's burden of proof, and the need to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Manslaughter was not an option as the prosecution had only set out to prove that Lynn had consciously, voluntarily, and deliberately caused the deaths of Russell and Carroll.

The jury were only left to consider if he had intended to kill or inflict serious injury. If not, they must return a not guilty verdict. The judge cautioned them against flawed reasoning, such as assuming two accidental deaths were so improbable it must therefore be murder. He reminded jurors that the burden rested with the prosecution, not Lynn, to prove their case.

The jury were only left to consider if he had intended to kill or inflict serious injury. If not, they must return a not guilty verdict. The judge cautioned them against flawed reasoning, such as assuming two accidental deaths were so improbable it must therefore be murder. He reminded jurors that the burden rested with the prosecution, not Lynn, to prove their case.

The jury were only left to consider if he had intended to kill or inflict serious injury. If not, they must return a not guilty verdict. The judge cautioned them against flawed reasoning, such as assuming two accidental deaths were so improbable it must therefore be murder. He reminded jurors that the burden rested with the prosecution, not Lynn, to prove their case.

The jury deliberated for six days before notifying the judge that they had reached a verdict. The public gallery was full and the courtroom fell silent as the jury foreperson stood and waited for the judge to ask her two questions. Asked for a verdict on Russell Hill's murder, she responded, "...not guilty."

The jury deliberated for six days before notifying the judge that they had reached a verdict. The public gallery was full and the courtroom fell silent as the jury foreperson stood and waited for the judge to ask her two questions. Asked for a verdict on Russell Hill's murder, she responded, "...not guilty."

The jury deliberated for six days before notifying the judge that they had reached a verdict. The public gallery was full and the courtroom fell silent as the jury foreperson stood and waited for the judge to ask her two questions. Asked for a verdict on Russell Hill's murder, she responded, "...not guilty."

A soft collective gasp rippled through the gallery before the crowd fell silent to hear what she had to say to the next question. Asked about the murder of Carol Clay, the foreperson told the court, The gasps and murmurs were louder this time. Gregory Lynn raised his eyebrows at his fate but remained otherwise expressionless.

A soft collective gasp rippled through the gallery before the crowd fell silent to hear what she had to say to the next question. Asked about the murder of Carol Clay, the foreperson told the court, The gasps and murmurs were louder this time. Gregory Lynn raised his eyebrows at his fate but remained otherwise expressionless.

A soft collective gasp rippled through the gallery before the crowd fell silent to hear what she had to say to the next question. Asked about the murder of Carol Clay, the foreperson told the court, The gasps and murmurs were louder this time. Gregory Lynn raised his eyebrows at his fate but remained otherwise expressionless.