Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

Is that sort of to protect them from being, you know, press and book deals and all these people trying to go after them to find out what's going on behind closed doors?

Is that sort of to protect them from being, you know, press and book deals and all these people trying to go after them to find out what's going on behind closed doors?

Yes, because when I was looking at the OJ, the 1995 OJ questionnaire for his trial, it said, what do you think about a juror writing a book about his or her experience on a case? That's not illegal for them to write a book or do interviews.

Yes, because when I was looking at the OJ, the 1995 OJ questionnaire for his trial, it said, what do you think about a juror writing a book about his or her experience on a case? That's not illegal for them to write a book or do interviews.

Yes, because when I was looking at the OJ, the 1995 OJ questionnaire for his trial, it said, what do you think about a juror writing a book about his or her experience on a case? That's not illegal for them to write a book or do interviews.

Could you eliminate somebody from being a juror if they had suffered sexual assault?

Could you eliminate somebody from being a juror if they had suffered sexual assault?

Could you eliminate somebody from being a juror if they had suffered sexual assault?

That's so interesting what's going to happen there. I just feel like we're going to see it for this is going to set a precedent for these kind of cases.

That's so interesting what's going to happen there. I just feel like we're going to see it for this is going to set a precedent for these kind of cases.

That's so interesting what's going to happen there. I just feel like we're going to see it for this is going to set a precedent for these kind of cases.

There's all of this stuff about the jury, which is fascinating. There are some other things that have been filed, which I was like, oh, OK, this reference to not using Rule 412, 412, not using people's previous sexual history or previous... Or sexual proclivities as part of the trial.

There's all of this stuff about the jury, which is fascinating. There are some other things that have been filed, which I was like, oh, OK, this reference to not using Rule 412, 412, not using people's previous sexual history or previous... Or sexual proclivities as part of the trial.

There's all of this stuff about the jury, which is fascinating. There are some other things that have been filed, which I was like, oh, OK, this reference to not using Rule 412, 412, not using people's previous sexual history or previous... Or sexual proclivities as part of the trial.

That, to me, read as a really good thing because it would be very uncomfortable for somebody's entire sexual history to come with them onto the stand, particularly people who may have been victimised.

That, to me, read as a really good thing because it would be very uncomfortable for somebody's entire sexual history to come with them onto the stand, particularly people who may have been victimised.

That, to me, read as a really good thing because it would be very uncomfortable for somebody's entire sexual history to come with them onto the stand, particularly people who may have been victimised.

They've filed, the defense said, we're not going to use rule 412. And the prosecution said, we're not going to use it either. Did they say that because the defense said it? Or is that, is it just good practice?

They've filed, the defense said, we're not going to use rule 412. And the prosecution said, we're not going to use it either. Did they say that because the defense said it? Or is that, is it just good practice?

They've filed, the defense said, we're not going to use rule 412. And the prosecution said, we're not going to use it either. Did they say that because the defense said it? Or is that, is it just good practice?