Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

We should say, obviously, Diddy disputes that. But in terms of the defence preparing a new way to go at this, their statement that they've put out are these are not new allegations or new accusers. This is what they said to CBS News, a BBC's US partner. These are the same individuals, former long-term girlfriends who were involved in consensual relationships.

This was their private sex life defined by consent, not coercion. So once again, we're just going to have a trial of what did they consent to, what didn't they consent to, and trying to prove coercion on the stand, right?

This was their private sex life defined by consent, not coercion. So once again, we're just going to have a trial of what did they consent to, what didn't they consent to, and trying to prove coercion on the stand, right?

This was their private sex life defined by consent, not coercion. So once again, we're just going to have a trial of what did they consent to, what didn't they consent to, and trying to prove coercion on the stand, right?

We've had some other interesting filings relating to the victims. Cheyenne, what's been the update on what Victim 1 has now decided to do?

We've had some other interesting filings relating to the victims. Cheyenne, what's been the update on what Victim 1 has now decided to do?

We've had some other interesting filings relating to the victims. Cheyenne, what's been the update on what Victim 1 has now decided to do?

And when the government officially names that person, we will report it. So we've said before the testimony of victim one or the allegations from victim one closely aligned with those made by Cassie Ventura, the longtime romantic partner of Diddy.

And when the government officially names that person, we will report it. So we've said before the testimony of victim one or the allegations from victim one closely aligned with those made by Cassie Ventura, the longtime romantic partner of Diddy.

And when the government officially names that person, we will report it. So we've said before the testimony of victim one or the allegations from victim one closely aligned with those made by Cassie Ventura, the longtime romantic partner of Diddy.

Just in terms of what that looks like in a court, Cheyenne, for somebody who's never sat in criminal proceedings or in a court, what does that mean for victim one?

Just in terms of what that looks like in a court, Cheyenne, for somebody who's never sat in criminal proceedings or in a court, what does that mean for victim one?

Just in terms of what that looks like in a court, Cheyenne, for somebody who's never sat in criminal proceedings or in a court, what does that mean for victim one?

And they've said they both agreed to not use Rule 412, the previous sexual history, which I said last episode I was relieved about because it means you get less of that kind of, we're going to talk about your whole personal life outside of the limits of the date range that we speak about here. But if victim one is choosing to go use their name, walk into court, the press...

And they've said they both agreed to not use Rule 412, the previous sexual history, which I said last episode I was relieved about because it means you get less of that kind of, we're going to talk about your whole personal life outside of the limits of the date range that we speak about here. But if victim one is choosing to go use their name, walk into court, the press...

And they've said they both agreed to not use Rule 412, the previous sexual history, which I said last episode I was relieved about because it means you get less of that kind of, we're going to talk about your whole personal life outside of the limits of the date range that we speak about here. But if victim one is choosing to go use their name, walk into court, the press...

have made no such promise and they can go through and bring up people's past and dig things out as we have seen particularly like tabloid journalism there we've seen this happen a million times before so that's an even bigger consideration for somebody choosing to use their real name and identity.

have made no such promise and they can go through and bring up people's past and dig things out as we have seen particularly like tabloid journalism there we've seen this happen a million times before so that's an even bigger consideration for somebody choosing to use their real name and identity.

have made no such promise and they can go through and bring up people's past and dig things out as we have seen particularly like tabloid journalism there we've seen this happen a million times before so that's an even bigger consideration for somebody choosing to use their real name and identity.

It says, OK, the defence can argue against this, right? So this hasn't been decided. The defence must, quote, demonstrate a particularised need for disclosure, which the court weighs against the risk to the witness. What reason can you come up for saying we need to know the place you're employed, your address, names of your family members, identifying details as the defence? What can you say?