Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty
đ€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Joten se on se, mitÀ meillÀ on. Luulen, ettÀ meillÀ on aikaa vielÀ yhden kysymyksen. Hei FameUnderFirePod. En tiedÀ, mikÀ on todellinen ja mikÀ ei. TikTok kertoo, ettÀ siellÀ on e-mailit siitÀ, ettÀ lapset pitÀvÀt ylöspÀin. Kerro minulle, ettÀ se ei ole totta. Se on totta. Se on e-mail, jota Mark Trammo, yliopistossa Kaliforniassa, Los Angelesin, UCLAin, kirjoitti.
Now and at the time he sent it, he sent this to Epstein, quote, was just reading today that newborns will suck on a pacifier more vigorously if it triggers playback of a recording of her slash his mother's voice than another woman's voice. Have you read David Brooks' Social Animal was number one on New York Times books for quite a while.
Now at the time Mark Trammo sent this email to Epstein, Epstein was a registered child sex offender. There is no extra context given as to why he would send that. And that's not the only time Trammo appears in the files. Trammo also forwarded several 2010 messages he received from students seeking research guidance to Epstein, who responded to him, quote, Are either of these cute?
Tramo sanoi takaisin, ettÀ nÀemme, ettÀ sinÀ olet huono. Se on EFTA 00762250, jos haluat katsomaan. YhdistelmÀ UCLA-kampusjÀrjestöstÀ Daily Bruin. HÀn aloitti, ettÀ hÀn ei kÀsittele opiskelijoita e-mailin kohdalla. Sitten hÀn kÀsitti, ettÀ opiskelijat, joita kÀsiteltiin, eivÀt olleet hÀnen kurssinsa. HÀn ei kÀsittele, ettÀ hÀn ei tehnyt mitÀÀn kriisiÀ tai ettÀ hÀn ei ollut tietoinen Epsteinin huolta.
So those were some of our top asked questions on Epstein and I want to thank you for sending them in and please keep sending them. You can find me on Instagram and TikTok at Anushka underscore MD. But we have to remember with this story at the heart of it always is the survivors and the victims. Now earlier I spoke to Eric Fidali from the Bloom Law Firm. He represents 11 survivors and he filled me in on an update in their fight for justice.
But in filing that lawsuit against the DOJ, isn't their response, we're doing our best, we get this information, we're investigating what we can, and don't they technically have immunity from lawsuits?
Ja sinÀ sanoit, ettÀ he ovat olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet olleet
There has been calls from members of the public who say, you know, we've heard that survivors are willing and currently putting together a list of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged associates. Release the list. We believe you. We will believe what you say. It's one thing saying it, but doesn't that leave them in quite a vulnerable position?
One last question. In light of all of this and everything that's happened over the past couple of weeks, what does justice now look like for the survivors and the victims?
Aika mukavaa. Kiitos.
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
It's lovely to be here.
It's nice to see other people because I usually spend my time digging around in lawsuits involving some of the most famous people in the world.
We've had rappers, world leaders, right-wing influencers, you name it, we've got it.
But one thing that I am learning, which is I think why they put us together, is the PR sometimes is more important than what's actually going on in the courtroom.
So I want to pick your brains.
I always say we apply the same level of journalistic scrutiny to non-traditional power figures.
That's how I'd sum it up to people.
And that essentially means celebrities.