Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

Did Diddy's team directly respond to this allegation?

Es ist wichtig, dass sie das Recht hat, ihre Geschichte zu erzählen, aber wir können nicht korroborieren, was in diesem Moment passiert ist, weil niemand anderes da war. Du hast die Diary-Einträge erwähnt.

Es ist wichtig, dass sie das Recht hat, ihre Geschichte zu erzählen, aber wir können nicht korroborieren, was in diesem Moment passiert ist, weil niemand anderes da war. Du hast die Diary-Einträge erwähnt.

Es ist wichtig, dass sie das Recht hat, ihre Geschichte zu erzählen, aber wir können nicht korroborieren, was in diesem Moment passiert ist, weil niemand anderes da war. Du hast die Diary-Einträge erwähnt.

Dieser Dokument kam am Montagabend, am Dienstagabend. Könnten sie, die Großjury, beginnen, Subpoenas in die Hände von Leuten wie Katz zu stellen?

Dieser Dokument kam am Montagabend, am Dienstagabend. Könnten sie, die Großjury, beginnen, Subpoenas in die Hände von Leuten wie Katz zu stellen?

Dieser Dokument kam am Montagabend, am Dienstagabend. Könnten sie, die Großjury, beginnen, Subpoenas in die Hände von Leuten wie Katz zu stellen?

Now we need to talk about this $50 million lawsuit that's been filed. I mean, last weekend, me and Cheyenne both woke up to it being in our inboxes sent by Diddy's team. So that was a new one. They were letting us know that they are suing Courtney Burgess, Ariel Mitchell-Kidd and News Nation. Can you talk us through who is Courtney?

Now we need to talk about this $50 million lawsuit that's been filed. I mean, last weekend, me and Cheyenne both woke up to it being in our inboxes sent by Diddy's team. So that was a new one. They were letting us know that they are suing Courtney Burgess, Ariel Mitchell-Kidd and News Nation. Can you talk us through who is Courtney?

Now we need to talk about this $50 million lawsuit that's been filed. I mean, last weekend, me and Cheyenne both woke up to it being in our inboxes sent by Diddy's team. So that was a new one. They were letting us know that they are suing Courtney Burgess, Ariel Mitchell-Kidd and News Nation. Can you talk us through who is Courtney?

Sean, ist es normal, Presseanlagen zu senden? Nein. Warum würden sie das tun?

Sean, ist es normal, Presseanlagen zu senden? Nein. Warum würden sie das tun?

Sean, ist es normal, Presseanlagen zu senden? Nein. Warum würden sie das tun?

Like you were saying about putting the number, and we've spoken about this before, the number being used to sort of garner attention for the specific lawsuit. The lawsuit in and of itself is... It's got some oomph to it. British lawsuits, they do not write them like this. They're quite boring. But if you actually read it, it's got a lot of really colourful language.

Like you were saying about putting the number, and we've spoken about this before, the number being used to sort of garner attention for the specific lawsuit. The lawsuit in and of itself is... It's got some oomph to it. British lawsuits, they do not write them like this. They're quite boring. But if you actually read it, it's got a lot of really colourful language.

Like you were saying about putting the number, and we've spoken about this before, the number being used to sort of garner attention for the specific lawsuit. The lawsuit in and of itself is... It's got some oomph to it. British lawsuits, they do not write them like this. They're quite boring. But if you actually read it, it's got a lot of really colourful language.

It says, this case is about the defendant's willful scheme to broadcast and fabricate outrageous lies concerning Mr. Combs and then to leverage those falsehoods to gain social media fame, enrich themselves and strip Mr. Combs of his reputation, livelihood and right to a fair trial. I just want to pause there. It's not their responsibility that he gets a right to a fair trial, is it?

It says, this case is about the defendant's willful scheme to broadcast and fabricate outrageous lies concerning Mr. Combs and then to leverage those falsehoods to gain social media fame, enrich themselves and strip Mr. Combs of his reputation, livelihood and right to a fair trial. I just want to pause there. It's not their responsibility that he gets a right to a fair trial, is it?

It says, this case is about the defendant's willful scheme to broadcast and fabricate outrageous lies concerning Mr. Combs and then to leverage those falsehoods to gain social media fame, enrich themselves and strip Mr. Combs of his reputation, livelihood and right to a fair trial. I just want to pause there. It's not their responsibility that he gets a right to a fair trial, is it?

Es sagt, die Defendanten haben, Quote,