Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

Let's touch on the cross-examination. Now, you've got the crystal ball, you told the future, it was all going to come down to consent. You've told us this pretty much from episode one of this, from program one of this podcast.

And a lot of it hinged on going through multiple text messages, emails, correspondence between Didi and Cassie, where Cassie puts in writing, I am looking forward to this, freak off. we can freak off anytime. I love it when we freak off and we both want to freak off. Multiple messages where she seems to express that she wanted to participate in the freak off. Now,

And a lot of it hinged on going through multiple text messages, emails, correspondence between Didi and Cassie, where Cassie puts in writing, I am looking forward to this, freak off. we can freak off anytime. I love it when we freak off and we both want to freak off. Multiple messages where she seems to express that she wanted to participate in the freak off. Now,

And a lot of it hinged on going through multiple text messages, emails, correspondence between Didi and Cassie, where Cassie puts in writing, I am looking forward to this, freak off. we can freak off anytime. I love it when we freak off and we both want to freak off. Multiple messages where she seems to express that she wanted to participate in the freak off. Now,

She responded to that saying, you know, these are just words. And she also later on said, sometimes I just say it so he leave me alone. Sometimes I do stuff to kind of mitigate against him asking me to do it.

She responded to that saying, you know, these are just words. And she also later on said, sometimes I just say it so he leave me alone. Sometimes I do stuff to kind of mitigate against him asking me to do it.

She responded to that saying, you know, these are just words. And she also later on said, sometimes I just say it so he leave me alone. Sometimes I do stuff to kind of mitigate against him asking me to do it.

But when you're talking about the sex trafficking, doesn't that mean if she's putting stuff in black and white in text, how could he, beyond a reasonable doubt, think that she had withdrawn her consent?

But when you're talking about the sex trafficking, doesn't that mean if she's putting stuff in black and white in text, how could he, beyond a reasonable doubt, think that she had withdrawn her consent?

But when you're talking about the sex trafficking, doesn't that mean if she's putting stuff in black and white in text, how could he, beyond a reasonable doubt, think that she had withdrawn her consent?

We've got a great question here that said, it might be obvious, but I've been wondering, if the prosecution has compelling, say, video evidence of victims being forced into sexual acts or drugs, would the defence be well aware of that beforehand? And if they have a kind of ace up their sleeve of somebody being forced or frauded into sex trafficking on tape, wouldn't, did he have taken a plea deal?

We've got a great question here that said, it might be obvious, but I've been wondering, if the prosecution has compelling, say, video evidence of victims being forced into sexual acts or drugs, would the defence be well aware of that beforehand? And if they have a kind of ace up their sleeve of somebody being forced or frauded into sex trafficking on tape, wouldn't, did he have taken a plea deal?

We've got a great question here that said, it might be obvious, but I've been wondering, if the prosecution has compelling, say, video evidence of victims being forced into sexual acts or drugs, would the defence be well aware of that beforehand? And if they have a kind of ace up their sleeve of somebody being forced or frauded into sex trafficking on tape, wouldn't, did he have taken a plea deal?

Or is, they ask, is that too logical, too simplistic of a thought pattern? So this is from Laws in Australia.

Or is, they ask, is that too logical, too simplistic of a thought pattern? So this is from Laws in Australia.

Or is, they ask, is that too logical, too simplistic of a thought pattern? So this is from Laws in Australia.

Yeah, I find it confusing, though, because when we had that initial press conference with the attorney general and they spoke about finding video materials in the March raids on Diddy's properties that they say showed people being victimized on tape. So where did that go or did they misinterpret it?

Yeah, I find it confusing, though, because when we had that initial press conference with the attorney general and they spoke about finding video materials in the March raids on Diddy's properties that they say showed people being victimized on tape. So where did that go or did they misinterpret it?

Yeah, I find it confusing, though, because when we had that initial press conference with the attorney general and they spoke about finding video materials in the March raids on Diddy's properties that they say showed people being victimized on tape. So where did that go or did they misinterpret it?

There has been discussion on social media about some of the stuff that we heard in opening statements and in Cassie's Direct that the jury are presumably going to be so disgusted by stuff that they've heard, whether it will cloud their judgment of whether they think it's sex trafficking or not.