Anthony Pompliano

Why do you think that he was treated differently?

Now, if I understand this correctly, the company itself was doing this or not doing this, and that's why they were, the regulators went after them.

Is it common for the executive to be held liable?

You know, on one hand, I could see people saying, hey, the CEO should be held liable for what the business does.

On the other hand,

my understanding just on some cursory Google searches is like, you know, large banks or other financial institutions have been charged with similar things, but the executives themselves have not been pulled into it.

What is kind of like the standard treatment and difference between the executive and the company?

So let's hold constant that, OK, we understand what he did.

We know it's a fact that he got the pardon.

I think that there is a plethora of questions.

I've seen people talk in private conversation.

I've seen people talk on social media.

I've seen the media write articles about, you know, how did the pardon come together?

Was there some sort of pay to play?

Was there some sort of corruption involved?

Help people understand maybe like the process to getting a pardon.

And then we can talk about the specific critiques in this in this case.

When you submit the application, who gets it?

Is there a part in office?

Is there somebody in charge of that?