Anthony Pompliano

according to Anthropic, wanted to use AI to do two things.

So Anthropic basically said, hey, we are used in all these different use cases inside of the government, but the two things we're not comfortable with are, they said, domestic mass surveillance and the use of their AI models in autonomous weapons.

Now, I find it very funny because I don't think Sam Altman's writing that blog post.

Sam Altman probably saw that blog post and said, hey, Department of War, what do you need?

You got revenue, you want to invest in my company, right?

There's a very different kind of approach, I think, coming from them.

I do think that when you describe something as domestic mass surveillance, you're going to generate quite a bit of public support in terms of, hey, you know, we don't want that.

I don't know what the use case was.

There was no detail, right?

So like, who knows who's saying what or what's true, whatever.

The autonomous weapons, I think is, regardless of whether it's Anthropic, OpenAI, Grok, Gemini, Deepsea, any of them,

That is coming.

And we saw it in Ukraine with the drones.

And I don't think people quite are ready for that to be a topic of discussion where, you know, if you think about the autonomous dogs and autonomous, maybe we should call them robot dogs, right?

Because I don't know how autonomous they really are right now.

But when you see that, like these are being deployed.

There's a famous, either picture or video of, I think it's at Mar-a-Lago.

And they've got the dog and they've got the Secret Service guys.

And it's just kind of like, look, it's now like a dual layered thing of humans plus machines.

But when they're autonomous and let's say they have weapons.