Anthony Scaramucci

So we're against that. But if you're telling me now Trump wants a sphere of influence and he's going to, I guess, annex Canada and take back Panama Canal and buy or annex Greenland, and he's going to have a North American sphere of influence and

So we're against that. But if you're telling me now Trump wants a sphere of influence and he's going to, I guess, annex Canada and take back Panama Canal and buy or annex Greenland, and he's going to have a North American sphere of influence and

Putin's going to have a partial Eurasian sphere of influence with the Chinese, and we're going to be indifferent to Europe and Eastern Europe and the Western European democracies. Okay. But if we're doing that, we got to litigate that, Jess. We can't just say, okay, we're going to let that happen. How are we going to let that happen?

Putin's going to have a partial Eurasian sphere of influence with the Chinese, and we're going to be indifferent to Europe and Eastern Europe and the Western European democracies. Okay. But if we're doing that, we got to litigate that, Jess. We can't just say, okay, we're going to let that happen. How are we going to let that happen?

Putin's going to have a partial Eurasian sphere of influence with the Chinese, and we're going to be indifferent to Europe and Eastern Europe and the Western European democracies. Okay. But if we're doing that, we got to litigate that, Jess. We can't just say, okay, we're going to let that happen. How are we going to let that happen?

Okay, so I think you're making a brilliant analysis of what's happening.

Okay, so I think you're making a brilliant analysis of what's happening.

Okay, so I think you're making a brilliant analysis of what's happening.

Just say it was brilliant. I do think it's a brilliant analysis, and I just want to go back a little bit, and I want to get your reaction to what I'm about to say. So I think our failure has to do with political service and public service indifference born from... the laxity of getting reelected. And just hear me out for a second. So Ross Perot enters the race in 1992.

Just say it was brilliant. I do think it's a brilliant analysis, and I just want to go back a little bit, and I want to get your reaction to what I'm about to say. So I think our failure has to do with political service and public service indifference born from... the laxity of getting reelected. And just hear me out for a second. So Ross Perot enters the race in 1992.

Just say it was brilliant. I do think it's a brilliant analysis, and I just want to go back a little bit, and I want to get your reaction to what I'm about to say. So I think our failure has to do with political service and public service indifference born from... the laxity of getting reelected. And just hear me out for a second. So Ross Perot enters the race in 1992.

He gets 19.9% of the vote as a third party, scares the life out of the Republicans and the Democrats. They strengthened a duopoly. They strengthen it. How do they do that? Tougher restrictions for third parties, tougher operational procedures, more signatures, lots more money. Can't form a third party the last three decades.

He gets 19.9% of the vote as a third party, scares the life out of the Republicans and the Democrats. They strengthened a duopoly. They strengthen it. How do they do that? Tougher restrictions for third parties, tougher operational procedures, more signatures, lots more money. Can't form a third party the last three decades.

He gets 19.9% of the vote as a third party, scares the life out of the Republicans and the Democrats. They strengthened a duopoly. They strengthen it. How do they do that? Tougher restrictions for third parties, tougher operational procedures, more signatures, lots more money. Can't form a third party the last three decades.

Secondly, that happens is they go after the gerrymandering with a vengeance. Both sides do. And I submit to you, are we in a real democracy if the politicians are picking the voters? I thought the voters are supposed to pick the politicians. And so now we have a 14% approval rating for the Congress, just above Kim Il-Jung, but we have a 95 plus percent reelection rate for the incumbent.

Secondly, that happens is they go after the gerrymandering with a vengeance. Both sides do. And I submit to you, are we in a real democracy if the politicians are picking the voters? I thought the voters are supposed to pick the politicians. And so now we have a 14% approval rating for the Congress, just above Kim Il-Jung, but we have a 95 plus percent reelection rate for the incumbent.

Secondly, that happens is they go after the gerrymandering with a vengeance. Both sides do. And I submit to you, are we in a real democracy if the politicians are picking the voters? I thought the voters are supposed to pick the politicians. And so now we have a 14% approval rating for the Congress, just above Kim Il-Jung, but we have a 95 plus percent reelection rate for the incumbent.

So it's almost like having a chef got horrific Yelp ratings for the restaurant, but the chef is still employed because it's the only restaurant in town. And so what ends up happening is they become very lax, very complacent. Third thing that happens is Citizens United. Lots of money gushes into these people from big business, oligarchs, big pharma.

So it's almost like having a chef got horrific Yelp ratings for the restaurant, but the chef is still employed because it's the only restaurant in town. And so what ends up happening is they become very lax, very complacent. Third thing that happens is Citizens United. Lots of money gushes into these people from big business, oligarchs, big pharma.

So it's almost like having a chef got horrific Yelp ratings for the restaurant, but the chef is still employed because it's the only restaurant in town. And so what ends up happening is they become very lax, very complacent. Third thing that happens is Citizens United. Lots of money gushes into these people from big business, oligarchs, big pharma.