Anthony Zerker

Now, as for your question about whether anyone or anybody or anything could be done to stop Trump's decision to suspend aid, it is possible. But all of that is part of what is a larger legal battle. Congress approved continued funding for Ukraine. That's just the bottom line. They assigned the money and it's up to the president to distribute it. It's his obligation.

Now, as for your question about whether anyone or anybody or anything could be done to stop Trump's decision to suspend aid, it is possible. But all of that is part of what is a larger legal battle. Congress approved continued funding for Ukraine. That's just the bottom line. They assigned the money and it's up to the president to distribute it. It's his obligation.

But as with many other areas of government spending, Trump is simply refusing to do so, at least temporarily. It's going to be up to the courts and perhaps ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court to decide how much scope, how much freedom the president has to simply ignore the instructions of Congress.

But as with many other areas of government spending, Trump is simply refusing to do so, at least temporarily. It's going to be up to the courts and perhaps ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court to decide how much scope, how much freedom the president has to simply ignore the instructions of Congress.

But as with many other areas of government spending, Trump is simply refusing to do so, at least temporarily. It's going to be up to the courts and perhaps ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court to decide how much scope, how much freedom the president has to simply ignore the instructions of Congress.

So when push comes to shove, US presidents generally do have broad authority to conduct foreign policy. And that's something that the court is going to take into consideration. And it's not as though Trump wasn't clear in last year's presidential campaign how he felt about the Ukraine war, how he felt about Ukraine, and for that matter, Russia.

So when push comes to shove, US presidents generally do have broad authority to conduct foreign policy. And that's something that the court is going to take into consideration. And it's not as though Trump wasn't clear in last year's presidential campaign how he felt about the Ukraine war, how he felt about Ukraine, and for that matter, Russia.

So when push comes to shove, US presidents generally do have broad authority to conduct foreign policy. And that's something that the court is going to take into consideration. And it's not as though Trump wasn't clear in last year's presidential campaign how he felt about the Ukraine war, how he felt about Ukraine, and for that matter, Russia.

So I would say chances are Donald Trump is going to be able to do what he wants here, as he has with so many other things. And the rest of the world and the American public who would object to it are just going to have to find a way to deal with it.

So I would say chances are Donald Trump is going to be able to do what he wants here, as he has with so many other things. And the rest of the world and the American public who would object to it are just going to have to find a way to deal with it.

So I would say chances are Donald Trump is going to be able to do what he wants here, as he has with so many other things. And the rest of the world and the American public who would object to it are just going to have to find a way to deal with it.