Art Arthur

So that letter has to be presented to the immigration judge at the time that Mr. Khalil is presented in immigration court so that the judge can make a determination that it was properly issued. And really, the only part of this that the judge can rule on is whether or not it was properly issued. The judge can't second guess the foreign policy interest that was asserted.

So that letter has to be presented to the immigration judge at the time that Mr. Khalil is presented in immigration court so that the judge can make a determination that it was properly issued. And really, the only part of this that the judge can rule on is whether or not it was properly issued. The judge can't second guess the foreign policy interest that was asserted.

So that letter has to be presented to the immigration judge at the time that Mr. Khalil is presented in immigration court so that the judge can make a determination that it was properly issued. And really, the only part of this that the judge can rule on is whether or not it was properly issued. The judge can't second guess the foreign policy interest that was asserted.

But I think both sides in this case, Mike, and I think this is really the interesting part, both sides are looking forward to that hearing. And, you know, wait to see whether Khalil allows that hearing to be public or whether, you know, he asked for the courtroom to be closed. Is that up to Khalil and his attorneys to make that decision?

But I think both sides in this case, Mike, and I think this is really the interesting part, both sides are looking forward to that hearing. And, you know, wait to see whether Khalil allows that hearing to be public or whether, you know, he asked for the courtroom to be closed. Is that up to Khalil and his attorneys to make that decision?

But I think both sides in this case, Mike, and I think this is really the interesting part, both sides are looking forward to that hearing. And, you know, wait to see whether Khalil allows that hearing to be public or whether, you know, he asked for the courtroom to be closed. Is that up to Khalil and his attorneys to make that decision?

He can make that request and the judge generally will grant those requests. But I think that Mr. Khalil probably wants to use that hearing as a platform by which to say, I'm just a good guy. I'm simply here in the United States. I'm going to be the father of a child. You know, and, you know, to sort of, you know, present his political views.

He can make that request and the judge generally will grant those requests. But I think that Mr. Khalil probably wants to use that hearing as a platform by which to say, I'm just a good guy. I'm simply here in the United States. I'm going to be the father of a child. You know, and, you know, to sort of, you know, present his political views.

He can make that request and the judge generally will grant those requests. But I think that Mr. Khalil probably wants to use that hearing as a platform by which to say, I'm just a good guy. I'm simply here in the United States. I'm going to be the father of a child. You know, and, you know, to sort of, you know, present his political views.

I think that the administration is interested in, you know, using that hearing as a platform at which you can discuss everything that happened in Columbia University. If you do all the reading on the on this case and what happened in Columbia, I'm sure you have. I know I have. you know, it's all over the map. On the one hand, you know, they're simply peacefully protesting.

I think that the administration is interested in, you know, using that hearing as a platform at which you can discuss everything that happened in Columbia University. If you do all the reading on the on this case and what happened in Columbia, I'm sure you have. I know I have. you know, it's all over the map. On the one hand, you know, they're simply peacefully protesting.

I think that the administration is interested in, you know, using that hearing as a platform at which you can discuss everything that happened in Columbia University. If you do all the reading on the on this case and what happened in Columbia, I'm sure you have. I know I have. you know, it's all over the map. On the one hand, you know, they're simply peacefully protesting.

On the other hand, there are students that are afraid to go to class and custodians that were, you know, threatened with assault and locked in rooms. So, it'll be interesting to hear what comes out.

On the other hand, there are students that are afraid to go to class and custodians that were, you know, threatened with assault and locked in rooms. So, it'll be interesting to hear what comes out.

On the other hand, there are students that are afraid to go to class and custodians that were, you know, threatened with assault and locked in rooms. So, it'll be interesting to hear what comes out.

I think that the constitutionality of this ground removal is headed to the Supreme Court. It was only used once in the past in a case that was very tangentially involved and called matter of Ruiz-Masiu. It involved the former deputy attorney general of Mexico. Now, he died before that case could make its way through the federal courts.

I think that the constitutionality of this ground removal is headed to the Supreme Court. It was only used once in the past in a case that was very tangentially involved and called matter of Ruiz-Masiu. It involved the former deputy attorney general of Mexico. Now, he died before that case could make its way through the federal courts.

I think that the constitutionality of this ground removal is headed to the Supreme Court. It was only used once in the past in a case that was very tangentially involved and called matter of Ruiz-Masiu. It involved the former deputy attorney general of Mexico. Now, he died before that case could make its way through the federal courts.

I think the constitutionality of this one is definitely headed to the Supreme Court. But Mike, when it comes to foreign policy issues, the Supreme Court is very deferential to the executive branch.

I think the constitutionality of this one is definitely headed to the Supreme Court. But Mike, when it comes to foreign policy issues, the Supreme Court is very deferential to the executive branch.