Art Arthur

national security related information and in fact national security has been one of those things that's come up in the court case against this so you know it's

I'm not going to say it's a stretch, but it's definitely a novel interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act, which I think was last used during World War II when certain German, Italian, and primarily Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps. Now, again, none of these people are being detained in the United States. They're being sent out of the United States.

I'm not going to say it's a stretch, but it's definitely a novel interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act, which I think was last used during World War II when certain German, Italian, and primarily Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps. Now, again, none of these people are being detained in the United States. They're being sent out of the United States.

I'm not going to say it's a stretch, but it's definitely a novel interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act, which I think was last used during World War II when certain German, Italian, and primarily Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps. Now, again, none of these people are being detained in the United States. They're being sent out of the United States.

Yeah, the judge in question is Judge Jim Boasberg, who is the chief judge of the district court for the District of Columbia. And he is considering a lawsuit, a challenge to the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act. to deport individuals from the United States.

Yeah, the judge in question is Judge Jim Boasberg, who is the chief judge of the district court for the District of Columbia. And he is considering a lawsuit, a challenge to the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act. to deport individuals from the United States.

Yeah, the judge in question is Judge Jim Boasberg, who is the chief judge of the district court for the District of Columbia. And he is considering a lawsuit, a challenge to the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act. to deport individuals from the United States.

And generally, when the judiciary gets involved in any situation like this, the first thing that they do is tell everybody to just stop, hold on, so that the court has the opportunity to determine what's going on. He issued a temporary restraining order, which is, you know, that sort of just stop for a moment so I can figure it out.

And generally, when the judiciary gets involved in any situation like this, the first thing that they do is tell everybody to just stop, hold on, so that the court has the opportunity to determine what's going on. He issued a temporary restraining order, which is, you know, that sort of just stop for a moment so I can figure it out.

And generally, when the judiciary gets involved in any situation like this, the first thing that they do is tell everybody to just stop, hold on, so that the court has the opportunity to determine what's going on. He issued a temporary restraining order, which is, you know, that sort of just stop for a moment so I can figure it out.

As it relates to the foreign policy of the United States and Judge Boasberg's order, it gets into a question that the Trump administration had to deal with the first time around, and that is nationwide or universal injunctions. Generally, when you go into a court of law, you're arguing your case on behalf of yourself. Apparently, none of the people who were actually parties to that suit

As it relates to the foreign policy of the United States and Judge Boasberg's order, it gets into a question that the Trump administration had to deal with the first time around, and that is nationwide or universal injunctions. Generally, when you go into a court of law, you're arguing your case on behalf of yourself. Apparently, none of the people who were actually parties to that suit

As it relates to the foreign policy of the United States and Judge Boasberg's order, it gets into a question that the Trump administration had to deal with the first time around, and that is nationwide or universal injunctions. Generally, when you go into a court of law, you're arguing your case on behalf of yourself. Apparently, none of the people who were actually parties to that suit

were removed from the United States. The individuals who were removed from the United States were a larger class of individuals who weren't actually named parties. So, you know, the pushback from the Trump administration, in part, has to do with those universal jurisdictions, particularly given the fact that apparently these planes were outside of U.S.

were removed from the United States. The individuals who were removed from the United States were a larger class of individuals who weren't actually named parties. So, you know, the pushback from the Trump administration, in part, has to do with those universal jurisdictions, particularly given the fact that apparently these planes were outside of U.S.

were removed from the United States. The individuals who were removed from the United States were a larger class of individuals who weren't actually named parties. So, you know, the pushback from the Trump administration, in part, has to do with those universal jurisdictions, particularly given the fact that apparently these planes were outside of U.S.

airspace and therefore outside of the United States. But whenever the president attempts to use any of these novel authorities, he's going to get pushback. The question is how quickly the courts can move. The first time around, courts didn't move very quickly. And so a lot of Trump administration policies were simply sidelined indefinitely.

airspace and therefore outside of the United States. But whenever the president attempts to use any of these novel authorities, he's going to get pushback. The question is how quickly the courts can move. The first time around, courts didn't move very quickly. And so a lot of Trump administration policies were simply sidelined indefinitely.

airspace and therefore outside of the United States. But whenever the president attempts to use any of these novel authorities, he's going to get pushback. The question is how quickly the courts can move. The first time around, courts didn't move very quickly. And so a lot of Trump administration policies were simply sidelined indefinitely.

This time around, the administration's interested in having everything move a lot more quickly, having the courts issue decisions or alternatively not act at all and just let things proceed while the dust settles. So we're going to see how that ends up. All of this is going to the Supreme Court.