Arthur Brooks

That's hookup culture is one or one and two over and over again, or the emophilic problem of careening through and then the other person going, whoa, and then starting again and starting again and starting again.

That's hookup culture is one or one and two over and over again, or the emophilic problem of careening through and then the other person going, whoa, and then starting again and starting again and starting again.

That's hookup culture is one or one and two over and over again, or the emophilic problem of careening through and then the other person going, whoa, and then starting again and starting again and starting again.

So you're looking for somebody, people who go through the stages together and wind up bonding together permanently, but they need to go deeper and deeper and their brains need to imprint on each other in these particular ways. That's how the psychology of falling in love is really just a biology of falling in love.

So you're looking for somebody, people who go through the stages together and wind up bonding together permanently, but they need to go deeper and deeper and their brains need to imprint on each other in these particular ways. That's how the psychology of falling in love is really just a biology of falling in love.

So you're looking for somebody, people who go through the stages together and wind up bonding together permanently, but they need to go deeper and deeper and their brains need to imprint on each other in these particular ways. That's how the psychology of falling in love is really just a biology of falling in love.

So this is true. And there's a really interesting research going back to the 90s on this. You know the work of Arthur Aaron at SUNY Stony Brook. This actually got news because it was covered in the New York Times and it became sort of pop social psychology research. This was Love in the Lab. where he was actually simulating the neurochemical cascade. And here's how he did it. ALEX LANGSHUR Yeah.

So this is true. And there's a really interesting research going back to the 90s on this. You know the work of Arthur Aaron at SUNY Stony Brook. This actually got news because it was covered in the New York Times and it became sort of pop social psychology research. This was Love in the Lab. where he was actually simulating the neurochemical cascade. And here's how he did it. ALEX LANGSHUR Yeah.

So this is true. And there's a really interesting research going back to the 90s on this. You know the work of Arthur Aaron at SUNY Stony Brook. This actually got news because it was covered in the New York Times and it became sort of pop social psychology research. This was Love in the Lab. where he was actually simulating the neurochemical cascade. And here's how he did it. ALEX LANGSHUR Yeah.

So here's how he did it. He brought people into his lab. And it was people who didn't know each other, but who, based on surveys beforehand, were theoretically capable of falling in love with each other. So it wasn't people who were 30 years apart in age. And it was people who were opposite sex attracted and who would rate pictures of attractiveness more or less the same. So it was men and women.

So here's how he did it. He brought people into his lab. And it was people who didn't know each other, but who, based on surveys beforehand, were theoretically capable of falling in love with each other. So it wasn't people who were 30 years apart in age. And it was people who were opposite sex attracted and who would rate pictures of attractiveness more or less the same. So it was men and women.

So here's how he did it. He brought people into his lab. And it was people who didn't know each other, but who, based on surveys beforehand, were theoretically capable of falling in love with each other. So it wasn't people who were 30 years apart in age. And it was people who were opposite sex attracted and who would rate pictures of attractiveness more or less the same. So it was men and women.

It was all heterosexual potential couples. And they came into the lab. They come in opposite doors. They sit down at a table across from each other. And they don't know each other at all. They've never seen each other. Of course, it's undergraduate students because they'll do anything for 20 bucks. And he starts asking him questions. He asked him 36 questions that escalate in terms of intimacy.

It was all heterosexual potential couples. And they came into the lab. They come in opposite doors. They sit down at a table across from each other. And they don't know each other at all. They've never seen each other. Of course, it's undergraduate students because they'll do anything for 20 bucks. And he starts asking him questions. He asked him 36 questions that escalate in terms of intimacy.

It was all heterosexual potential couples. And they came into the lab. They come in opposite doors. They sit down at a table across from each other. And they don't know each other at all. They've never seen each other. Of course, it's undergraduate students because they'll do anything for 20 bucks. And he starts asking him questions. He asked him 36 questions that escalate in terms of intimacy.

So question one is, if you could have lunch with anybody or dinner with anybody in the world, who would it be and why? That's like an icebreaker at a party, right? Steve Jobs, you know, whoever it happens to be. Well, why? Question 30 is, when's the last time you cried?

So question one is, if you could have lunch with anybody or dinner with anybody in the world, who would it be and why? That's like an icebreaker at a party, right? Steve Jobs, you know, whoever it happens to be. Well, why? Question 30 is, when's the last time you cried?

So question one is, if you could have lunch with anybody or dinner with anybody in the world, who would it be and why? That's like an icebreaker at a party, right? Steve Jobs, you know, whoever it happens to be. Well, why? Question 30 is, when's the last time you cried?

And why now your mom doesn't know that your actual partner probably doesn't know that, but you have to answer the question and you're going super deep. So this is simulating. You're just, you're screaming through the process of intimacy with this person. And then, ha ha. Now it's when it gets really good.

And why now your mom doesn't know that your actual partner probably doesn't know that, but you have to answer the question and you're going super deep. So this is simulating. You're just, you're screaming through the process of intimacy with this person. And then, ha ha. Now it's when it gets really good.