Ashley Flowers

Leanne is saying that her son-in-law, who her daughter was on the outs with, was calling her with car trouble. A friend advised Leanne to let Charles kind of like sort it out himself. But he called Leanne back again an hour later, asking for help. Again, Leanne said no, and she went out that evening to an event. When she got home later that night, Charles called her a third time.

Leanne suspects that Charles was trying to get Leanne out of the way. Beyond that, though, she didn't have a clear theory on why he would want her out of the way or why he would even want to kill Sharon or what sequence of events led to her murder. But Leanne did end up sharing this information with authorities. And Detective Jackson said that he has heard this story about Charles Glover before.

Leanne suspects that Charles was trying to get Leanne out of the way. Beyond that, though, she didn't have a clear theory on why he would want her out of the way or why he would even want to kill Sharon or what sequence of events led to her murder. But Leanne did end up sharing this information with authorities. And Detective Jackson said that he has heard this story about Charles Glover before.

Leanne suspects that Charles was trying to get Leanne out of the way. Beyond that, though, she didn't have a clear theory on why he would want her out of the way or why he would even want to kill Sharon or what sequence of events led to her murder. But Leanne did end up sharing this information with authorities. And Detective Jackson said that he has heard this story about Charles Glover before.

Police never actually took Charles that seriously as a suspect after his alibi checked out. So they never searched his residence for a knife or recovered one belonging to him. Detective Jackson also debunked Leanne's concern about Charles burning his car. It wasn't actually Charles's vehicle at all that got burned.

Police never actually took Charles that seriously as a suspect after his alibi checked out. So they never searched his residence for a knife or recovered one belonging to him. Detective Jackson also debunked Leanne's concern about Charles burning his car. It wasn't actually Charles's vehicle at all that got burned.

Police never actually took Charles that seriously as a suspect after his alibi checked out. So they never searched his residence for a knife or recovered one belonging to him. Detective Jackson also debunked Leanne's concern about Charles burning his car. It wasn't actually Charles's vehicle at all that got burned.

It was a car that belonged to one of Sharon's boyfriends, a guy named Harold Thompson. And turns out, Harold didn't even set his car on fire. He had scrapped it after it stopped working. Detective Jackson said it was likely that the family had gotten these stories just mixed up. And when we reached out to Charles for comment, he declined to talk with us. But investigators hadn't run out of leads.

It was a car that belonged to one of Sharon's boyfriends, a guy named Harold Thompson. And turns out, Harold didn't even set his car on fire. He had scrapped it after it stopped working. Detective Jackson said it was likely that the family had gotten these stories just mixed up. And when we reached out to Charles for comment, he declined to talk with us. But investigators hadn't run out of leads.

It was a car that belonged to one of Sharon's boyfriends, a guy named Harold Thompson. And turns out, Harold didn't even set his car on fire. He had scrapped it after it stopped working. Detective Jackson said it was likely that the family had gotten these stories just mixed up. And when we reached out to Charles for comment, he declined to talk with us. But investigators hadn't run out of leads.

Soon after Sharon was identified, a tip came in through an anonymous source. The informant wanted police to know that a week before her murder, Sharon had been in an argument at a party, and that argument got heated. It's unclear what this argument was about, but apparently this woman pulled a machete on Sharon.

Soon after Sharon was identified, a tip came in through an anonymous source. The informant wanted police to know that a week before her murder, Sharon had been in an argument at a party, and that argument got heated. It's unclear what this argument was about, but apparently this woman pulled a machete on Sharon.

Soon after Sharon was identified, a tip came in through an anonymous source. The informant wanted police to know that a week before her murder, Sharon had been in an argument at a party, and that argument got heated. It's unclear what this argument was about, but apparently this woman pulled a machete on Sharon.

Now, there's no actual violence that happened, but I mean, someone pulls a machete on a person who turns up a week later stabbed to death, the police have to check it out. Detectives interviewed this woman, and while it's unclear whether her alibi was verified, they confiscated the machete and apparently a steak knife, and they had both of them tested.

Now, there's no actual violence that happened, but I mean, someone pulls a machete on a person who turns up a week later stabbed to death, the police have to check it out. Detectives interviewed this woman, and while it's unclear whether her alibi was verified, they confiscated the machete and apparently a steak knife, and they had both of them tested.

Now, there's no actual violence that happened, but I mean, someone pulls a machete on a person who turns up a week later stabbed to death, the police have to check it out. Detectives interviewed this woman, and while it's unclear whether her alibi was verified, they confiscated the machete and apparently a steak knife, and they had both of them tested.

Yet both of these weapons came back negative for any human blood. So police crossed this woman off their list of suspects. They next turned their sights to another man in Sharon's life, a guy named Charles McRae. Now, this is a second Charles, not her soon-to-be ex-husband, so to avoid confusion, I'm just going to refer to him as McCray.

Yet both of these weapons came back negative for any human blood. So police crossed this woman off their list of suspects. They next turned their sights to another man in Sharon's life, a guy named Charles McRae. Now, this is a second Charles, not her soon-to-be ex-husband, so to avoid confusion, I'm just going to refer to him as McCray.

Yet both of these weapons came back negative for any human blood. So police crossed this woman off their list of suspects. They next turned their sights to another man in Sharon's life, a guy named Charles McRae. Now, this is a second Charles, not her soon-to-be ex-husband, so to avoid confusion, I'm just going to refer to him as McCray.

Well, detectives heard rumors from some of Sharon's friends that McCray was a sex trafficker and could possibly have been trafficking Sharon at the time. McRae's criminal history returned drug trafficking charges and one count of murder. He's actually serving time in Texas for that. There were no sex trafficking charges.