Attorney
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
We were talking to people that were critical witnesses to us that had not spoken to the prosecutor's office.
We were talking to people that were critical witnesses to us that had not spoken to the prosecutor's office.
Kim with us was nonstop digging, digging for answers, getting proof. We were on an island all on our own.
Kim with us was nonstop digging, digging for answers, getting proof. We were on an island all on our own.
Fortunately, Damon Tyner became prosecutor and his team came to the conclusion that this case should be prosecuted.
Fortunately, Damon Tyner became prosecutor and his team came to the conclusion that this case should be prosecuted.
This is unit. This is Charlie 500 East. Nice to meet you all.
This is unit. This is Charlie 500 East. Nice to meet you all.
general of the jury. But it's built by the state of West Virginia on conjectures and innuendos, and glaringly lacking in both this and the evidence necessary to prove that Mike Lyon killed her husband. Natalie understood that we cannot present a defense that would somehow skirt the issue of the Ponzi scheme or that would hide it from the jury.
general of the jury. But it's built by the state of West Virginia on conjectures and innuendos, and glaringly lacking in both this and the evidence necessary to prove that Mike Lyon killed her husband. Natalie understood that we cannot present a defense that would somehow skirt the issue of the Ponzi scheme or that would hide it from the jury.
We admitted to the jury what was well known to everybody. The fact that she is perhaps a fraud and perhaps a cheat. and that you wouldn't perhaps want to invite her home for Sunday dinner, that you wouldn't like her, does not translate into being a murderer.
We admitted to the jury what was well known to everybody. The fact that she is perhaps a fraud and perhaps a cheat. and that you wouldn't perhaps want to invite her home for Sunday dinner, that you wouldn't like her, does not translate into being a murderer.
No. It was important to hammer home that Michael Cochrane was at least cognizant of the scheme because it would destroy the state's theory of why it happened. Have you, in your thorough investigation of this case, talked to the children of Mr. and Mrs. Cochrane? No.
No. It was important to hammer home that Michael Cochrane was at least cognizant of the scheme because it would destroy the state's theory of why it happened. Have you, in your thorough investigation of this case, talked to the children of Mr. and Mrs. Cochrane? No.
Would it surprise you if I told you that they observed their parents' work on the federal contracts, and you're telling this jury that he had no knowledge of these contracts?
Would it surprise you if I told you that they observed their parents' work on the federal contracts, and you're telling this jury that he had no knowledge of these contracts?
There was no forensic evidence to tie her to a murder. Zero forensic evidence.
There was no forensic evidence to tie her to a murder. Zero forensic evidence.