Audience Member 2
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Right. And so I guess just one more point. If it's to do with national security strictly, then why did we have an exemption on the tariffs for the Taiwan, the semiconductor stuff? Because I feel like that would be the number one. One of the number one national security interests, but I guess that you might say that it's an interest in protecting Taiwan.
Right. And so I guess just one more point. If it's to do with national security strictly, then why did we have an exemption on the tariffs for the Taiwan, the semiconductor stuff? Because I feel like that would be the number one. One of the number one national security interests, but I guess that you might say that it's an interest in protecting Taiwan.
Can I have one last question on South Korea, for example, where they're coming and they're striking a deal? We already had a free trade agreement in South Korea, so what would be the purpose of us imposing these huge tariffs on South Korea and then negotiating and coming back down to zero?
Can I have one last question on South Korea, for example, where they're coming and they're striking a deal? We already had a free trade agreement in South Korea, so what would be the purpose of us imposing these huge tariffs on South Korea and then negotiating and coming back down to zero?
Hi, my name is Samantha. I just want to say, excuse me for looking at my phone for notes. No worries, whatever. I want to talk about, have a good discussion about abortion.
Hi, my name is Samantha. I just want to say, excuse me for looking at my phone for notes. No worries, whatever. I want to talk about, have a good discussion about abortion.
Yeah, sure. I'm currently agnostic normatively. I'm leaning towards pro-choice in the virtue of the facts that I take it that pro-life views ultimately fail in accounting for relevant data, being the facts of the conversation, like biological, philosophical, and identity information. And I'm not convinced that identity is reductible down to the physical properties or the organism.
Yeah, sure. I'm currently agnostic normatively. I'm leaning towards pro-choice in the virtue of the facts that I take it that pro-life views ultimately fail in accounting for relevant data, being the facts of the conversation, like biological, philosophical, and identity information. And I'm not convinced that identity is reductible down to the physical properties or the organism.
I think we are our mind.
I think we are our mind.
What do you mean?
What do you mean?
I think our identity is down to our mind, yes.
I think our identity is down to our mind, yes.
Yeah, the mind is just going to be like sentience.
Yeah, the mind is just going to be like sentience.
I think they fail because, like, I don't think that the being, like, one is at conception is the same being that they are now. And I don't mean that, like, descriptively. I take it that you are, like, your mind. And before a certain week in gestation, there is no mind or sentience, right? And thus, no person, just physical properties. And that would eventually be informed by that said mind.
I think they fail because, like, I don't think that the being, like, one is at conception is the same being that they are now. And I don't mean that, like, descriptively. I take it that you are, like, your mind. And before a certain week in gestation, there is no mind or sentience, right? And thus, no person, just physical properties. And that would eventually be informed by that said mind.
Yeah, I just said that mind is like sentience, like having a human subjective experience.
Yeah, I just said that mind is like sentience, like having a human subjective experience.