Augustus Doricko

No, I think that would be

not just an overcorrection, but like unsound policy.

But should there be radical transparency?

Should there be serious regulation and permitting around this?

Should there be reporting so that people are able to scrutinize the information from cloud seeding activities?

And should there be monitoring from institutions like NOAA or the National Weather Service to look for nefarious or malevolent weather modification operations?

Yeah, absolutely.

Not at all.

When we cloud seed and create these snowflakes, right,

the initial snowflakes that are created are created by water freezing onto the silver iodide, right?

But then those snowflakes break apart and create more snowflakes, and you get this chain reaction where, you know, the concentration of silver iodide is de minimis.

Like I said before,

After decades of operating, we've only seen as much as an increase in like eight parts per trillion of silver iodide in soil where cloud seeding is occurring.

There's already two parts per million in most American soil.

So like if even it is a statistically significant result, after decades of operation, cloud seeding has added a million times less than what's naturally there.

So there's no adverse ecological effects at all.

Certainly not enough to change the color of the rain.

I don't know what that was.

I hope it's not more deliberate disinformation content.

Yeah.