Auron MacIntyre

That's how they operate.

I mean, with the situation in the South, what you're looking about, like you said, our founding fathers pointed out that the reason they needed to leave is that they wanted the rights of the Englishmen.

Like that was their problem.

They wanted the rights that they felt they were entitled to as Englishmen and that was not being upheld by the parliament.

A lot of people say it was a war against the king, but actually they appealed to the king regularly, hoping that he would save them from parliament.

And when he wouldn't,

Only then did they say, OK, now we have to appeal to heaven because we have no other place to appeal.

We have the right of a revolution.

I think this is a bad understanding from Grant.

I mean, obviously, they participate in the government.

The South decided that they were not receiving the rights that they believe that they were due.

And if the 10th Amendment means anything, if their states actually have rights reserved to them, then the right to leave has to be part of it.

If you don't have a right to leave, you don't have a right to anything.

now ultimately i don't think any government can actually enshrine the right of revolution i think that's not how constitutions actually work but spiritually morally i think you do have a a fair argument for being able to leave at that time of course people tie the the word of slavery and that's why now they just make it that instead but on the issue of a leftist bearing arms in minnesota for the purpose of uh it's it's intimidation against ice

Are they?

Is the open carry allowed in Minnesota?

Oh, it is.

So he was lawfully.

I'm fine with states' rights as long as we all get them.

The funny thing is, I know the Democrats, this is all going to disappear tomorrow, right?