Austin

I'm not against every single change that can be implemented to the game, like the pitch clock, the...

change in baseball where you had to face the three batter minimum?

The pitch clock was definitely thought of as gimmicky.

You're putting a clock on the score and people were very upset with it.

I'm okay with it now, yeah.

And the 25-year-old is the old guy here, Bob.

24.

So in the 2009 Stanley Cup run then, TK, when Billy Guerin scored against the Flyers and when Chris Letang scored in Game 3 against the Caps, you're saying that you'd rather that be 3-on-3.

What difference does it make if they scored 3-on-3 or 5-on-5?

My overarching point with this is the regular season, if you want to have some of those gimmicks like putting a runner on second base in the 10th inning or playing three-on-three and having a shootout is okay because it's the regular season.

But the postseason is a different animal.

It's a different beast.

It's further elevated and further heightened.

It's still competitive and it's still equal.

And if it gets to overtime, not change the format of the game.

I think the playoffs are just that important that it should stay the same.

The format's the same way.

Not my cup of tea.

Not a fan of it.

I'm entertained by it, but I don't want to see it in the postseason.