Barry

I guess the problem, though, is that it's sort of a race to the bottom. It's like one side saying, hey, you weaponize the justice system. And they did. And the other side is saying, hey, you weaponize the justice system. And they did. How do you end that sort of like cycle? Is there any way to end it at all?

I guess the problem, though, is that it's sort of a race to the bottom. It's like one side saying, hey, you weaponize the justice system. And they did. And the other side is saying, hey, you weaponize the justice system. And they did. How do you end that sort of like cycle? Is there any way to end it at all?

Let's talk about just the pure political strategy of this move. How is the MAGA movement, how's the base responding to this? Was this essential for Trump to do?

Let's talk about just the pure political strategy of this move. How is the MAGA movement, how's the base responding to this? Was this essential for Trump to do?

Let's talk about just the pure political strategy of this move. How is the MAGA movement, how's the base responding to this? Was this essential for Trump to do?

Do you guys think that if he had made the distinction between the people who had not attacked police officers and those that had and really been specific in who was pardoned, that it would have gone a long way to kind of restoring just the total degradation of trust in the rule of law? You have one side that each side feels like there's like a two-tiered justice system.

Do you guys think that if he had made the distinction between the people who had not attacked police officers and those that had and really been specific in who was pardoned, that it would have gone a long way to kind of restoring just the total degradation of trust in the rule of law? You have one side that each side feels like there's like a two-tiered justice system.

Do you guys think that if he had made the distinction between the people who had not attacked police officers and those that had and really been specific in who was pardoned, that it would have gone a long way to kind of restoring just the total degradation of trust in the rule of law? You have one side that each side feels like there's like a two-tiered justice system.

I think there's also kind of an aesthetic difference here. Right. You had Joe Biden and the Democrats talking actively all the time about. the rule of law, the rule of law, liberal democracy, how they're going to restore it. There was an amazing Sarah Isger essay a few days ago called The Quiet Lawlessness of Joe Biden.

I think there's also kind of an aesthetic difference here. Right. You had Joe Biden and the Democrats talking actively all the time about. the rule of law, the rule of law, liberal democracy, how they're going to restore it. There was an amazing Sarah Isger essay a few days ago called The Quiet Lawlessness of Joe Biden.

I think there's also kind of an aesthetic difference here. Right. You had Joe Biden and the Democrats talking actively all the time about. the rule of law, the rule of law, liberal democracy, how they're going to restore it. There was an amazing Sarah Isger essay a few days ago called The Quiet Lawlessness of Joe Biden.

He was elected to restore norms, but has done more damage to the rule of law than any other president. For context, Sarah Isger is not where Batya Agra Sargon is on the question of Trump or MAGA. She's like a never-Trumper and a wonderful legal scholar. So for her to say that is significant. And you sort of see that as opposed to Trump, right, who's going on Truth Social and who spent the campaign

He was elected to restore norms, but has done more damage to the rule of law than any other president. For context, Sarah Isger is not where Batya Agra Sargon is on the question of Trump or MAGA. She's like a never-Trumper and a wonderful legal scholar. So for her to say that is significant. And you sort of see that as opposed to Trump, right, who's going on Truth Social and who spent the campaign

He was elected to restore norms, but has done more damage to the rule of law than any other president. For context, Sarah Isger is not where Batya Agra Sargon is on the question of Trump or MAGA. She's like a never-Trumper and a wonderful legal scholar. So for her to say that is significant. And you sort of see that as opposed to Trump, right, who's going on Truth Social and who spent the campaign

talking about vengeance but the question is whether or not he's going to do it you sort of see that also though in the warring tech oligarchies right or let's just say the warring money on each side where george soros is quiet about the way that he spends his billions and does it through all of these different shell ngos as opposed to elon musk that's going on the campaign trail offering people a million dollars if they register to vote or whatever it is so i think part of it is also like the

talking about vengeance but the question is whether or not he's going to do it you sort of see that also though in the warring tech oligarchies right or let's just say the warring money on each side where george soros is quiet about the way that he spends his billions and does it through all of these different shell ngos as opposed to elon musk that's going on the campaign trail offering people a million dollars if they register to vote or whatever it is so i think part of it is also like the

talking about vengeance but the question is whether or not he's going to do it you sort of see that also though in the warring tech oligarchies right or let's just say the warring money on each side where george soros is quiet about the way that he spends his billions and does it through all of these different shell ngos as opposed to elon musk that's going on the campaign trail offering people a million dollars if they register to vote or whatever it is so i think part of it is also like the

the aesthetics of each side and the way that they try and hide or expose what they're doing. Does that make sense?

the aesthetics of each side and the way that they try and hide or expose what they're doing. Does that make sense?

the aesthetics of each side and the way that they try and hide or expose what they're doing. Does that make sense?