Bart Sibrel

On the right is a picture they claim was from the last, quote, mission to the moon, where an astronaut's shadow is at 12 o'clock and a rock five feet away is intersecting at 9 o'clock at 90 degrees. That is an electrical light that is very, very close to those objects.

On the right is a picture they claim was from the last, quote, mission to the moon, where an astronaut's shadow is at 12 o'clock and a rock five feet away is intersecting at 9 o'clock at 90 degrees. That is an electrical light that is very, very close to those objects.

On the right is a picture they claim was from the last, quote, mission to the moon, where an astronaut's shadow is at 12 o'clock and a rock five feet away is intersecting at 9 o'clock at 90 degrees. That is an electrical light that is very, very close to those objects.

That proves in a court of law that that picture on the right was taken with a very close electrical light, which means they're on Earth, which means they did not go to the moon. That's it. We just proved the moon landing was fake in one photograph.

That proves in a court of law that that picture on the right was taken with a very close electrical light, which means they're on Earth, which means they did not go to the moon. That's it. We just proved the moon landing was fake in one photograph.

That proves in a court of law that that picture on the right was taken with a very close electrical light, which means they're on Earth, which means they did not go to the moon. That's it. We just proved the moon landing was fake in one photograph.

Well, here's another example of intersecting shadows. There's a shadow of an antenna, which is going at about 10 o'clock, and the astronaut's shadow a few feet away is going at 12 o'clock. This is another example of intersecting shadows, which means it's an electrical light that's really close. Because the sun is 93 million miles away, a million times bigger than the Earth in volume.

Well, here's another example of intersecting shadows. There's a shadow of an antenna, which is going at about 10 o'clock, and the astronaut's shadow a few feet away is going at 12 o'clock. This is another example of intersecting shadows, which means it's an electrical light that's really close. Because the sun is 93 million miles away, a million times bigger than the Earth in volume.

Well, here's another example of intersecting shadows. There's a shadow of an antenna, which is going at about 10 o'clock, and the astronaut's shadow a few feet away is going at 12 o'clock. This is another example of intersecting shadows, which means it's an electrical light that's really close. Because the sun is 93 million miles away, a million times bigger than the Earth in volume.

It would always cast shadows parallel with one another, no matter what time of day, no matter whether the landscape is angular or not.

It would always cast shadows parallel with one another, no matter what time of day, no matter whether the landscape is angular or not.

It would always cast shadows parallel with one another, no matter what time of day, no matter whether the landscape is angular or not.

No, it doesn't matter. If you go back to the original picture, you'll see one of the telephone pole shadows. Actually, you can't see it. It's a little off camera, but it goes up the side of the house. So both shadows go up the side of the house and remain parallel up the side of the house. So it doesn't matter.

No, it doesn't matter. If you go back to the original picture, you'll see one of the telephone pole shadows. Actually, you can't see it. It's a little off camera, but it goes up the side of the house. So both shadows go up the side of the house and remain parallel up the side of the house. So it doesn't matter.

No, it doesn't matter. If you go back to the original picture, you'll see one of the telephone pole shadows. Actually, you can't see it. It's a little off camera, but it goes up the side of the house. So both shadows go up the side of the house and remain parallel up the side of the house. So it doesn't matter.

Even if the landscape changes by 90 degrees with the house, that shadow, which you can't see, though, goes straight up. And if the shadow from the telephone pole were next to it or if the house was bigger, it would also go straight up and remain parallel. It doesn't make them intersect, regardless of the landscape. They remain parallel.

Even if the landscape changes by 90 degrees with the house, that shadow, which you can't see, though, goes straight up. And if the shadow from the telephone pole were next to it or if the house was bigger, it would also go straight up and remain parallel. It doesn't make them intersect, regardless of the landscape. They remain parallel.

Even if the landscape changes by 90 degrees with the house, that shadow, which you can't see, though, goes straight up. And if the shadow from the telephone pole were next to it or if the house was bigger, it would also go straight up and remain parallel. It doesn't make them intersect, regardless of the landscape. They remain parallel.

Well, there's either two light sources or one light source that is really close because they're diverging at 90 degrees from objects five feet apart. And I can tell you as a professional filmmaker, that's taken with an electrical light that's very close.

Well, there's either two light sources or one light source that is really close because they're diverging at 90 degrees from objects five feet apart. And I can tell you as a professional filmmaker, that's taken with an electrical light that's very close.