Bart Sibrel

I show that first picture because it's the greatest or most extreme example of it. 90-degree difference from objects five feet apart. You could prove that in a court of law. You could take the jury out and show them two trees, two telephone poles like I showed.

Then you could bring them in the courtroom, bring in one or two electrical lights until they intersect, and you just proved in a court of law that the moon missions are fake with one picture. You see that? That's all it takes. That and an open mind.

Then you could bring them in the courtroom, bring in one or two electrical lights until they intersect, and you just proved in a court of law that the moon missions are fake with one picture. You see that? That's all it takes. That and an open mind.

Then you could bring them in the courtroom, bring in one or two electrical lights until they intersect, and you just proved in a court of law that the moon missions are fake with one picture. You see that? That's all it takes. That and an open mind.

It said every single Apollo picture it was shown was fake because of the backgrounds were fake. It can analyze the pixels and the geometric direction of every shadow of every rock in there. And there's something different a computer can pick up mathematically between the angles of the foreground where the real soil is and the background, which was video projection or still projection.

It said every single Apollo picture it was shown was fake because of the backgrounds were fake. It can analyze the pixels and the geometric direction of every shadow of every rock in there. And there's something different a computer can pick up mathematically between the angles of the foreground where the real soil is and the background, which was video projection or still projection.

It said every single Apollo picture it was shown was fake because of the backgrounds were fake. It can analyze the pixels and the geometric direction of every shadow of every rock in there. And there's something different a computer can pick up mathematically between the angles of the foreground where the real soil is and the background, which was video projection or still projection.

And the angles went off or the pixels changed or something. The computer can pick it up. And it said every single Apollo picture it was shown had a fake background, meaning it was taken in a TV studio, which means they were on Earth, which means they didn't go to the moon. So there you go. That's the fifth proof.

And the angles went off or the pixels changed or something. The computer can pick it up. And it said every single Apollo picture it was shown had a fake background, meaning it was taken in a TV studio, which means they were on Earth, which means they didn't go to the moon. So there you go. That's the fifth proof.

And the angles went off or the pixels changed or something. The computer can pick it up. And it said every single Apollo picture it was shown had a fake background, meaning it was taken in a TV studio, which means they were on Earth, which means they didn't go to the moon. So there you go. That's the fifth proof.

The smartest computer in the world that has a deepfake detector program that has never been wrong just said the Apollo missions were fake. And go to my website, sabrell.com. I have a video that shows the original link in Russian to that story.

The smartest computer in the world that has a deepfake detector program that has never been wrong just said the Apollo missions were fake. And go to my website, sabrell.com. I have a video that shows the original link in Russian to that story.

The smartest computer in the world that has a deepfake detector program that has never been wrong just said the Apollo missions were fake. And go to my website, sabrell.com. I have a video that shows the original link in Russian to that story.

If you click on it, a warning comes up saying if you proceed to find out that the AI just said the moon missions are fake, all the data on your computer will be stolen and you'll be associated with child pornography. Well, that's how desperate they are to make sure people don't find out that the latest AI just said the moon missions were fake.

If you click on it, a warning comes up saying if you proceed to find out that the AI just said the moon missions are fake, all the data on your computer will be stolen and you'll be associated with child pornography. Well, that's how desperate they are to make sure people don't find out that the latest AI just said the moon missions were fake.

If you click on it, a warning comes up saying if you proceed to find out that the AI just said the moon missions are fake, all the data on your computer will be stolen and you'll be associated with child pornography. Well, that's how desperate they are to make sure people don't find out that the latest AI just said the moon missions were fake.

Is that a component of the... Well, technically, it is proof that they didn't go, but I don't consider it one of the four concrete proofs. The fifth could be the AI. They argue that... the exposure was set for the brightness of the moon's surface, which means the aperture was almost all the way closed, and therefore the faint lights in the background didn't show up.

Is that a component of the... Well, technically, it is proof that they didn't go, but I don't consider it one of the four concrete proofs. The fifth could be the AI. They argue that... the exposure was set for the brightness of the moon's surface, which means the aperture was almost all the way closed, and therefore the faint lights in the background didn't show up.

Is that a component of the... Well, technically, it is proof that they didn't go, but I don't consider it one of the four concrete proofs. The fifth could be the AI. They argue that... the exposure was set for the brightness of the moon's surface, which means the aperture was almost all the way closed, and therefore the faint lights in the background didn't show up.

It does contradict a picture that NASA took on Earth with heavy atmosphere at sunrise of the space shuttle where you see stars in the background and a bright foreground. But in any case... The problem is, why didn't they take any pictures of the stars by themselves? They would have had the clearest image ever taken of any stars in the history of mankind.