Ben Rubin

And I actually think that there is, and I might be just projecting a lot of things here, but I think that there's an opportunity here to do the same thing, to create a dating backend, if you will, with some sort of a client that actually allow people to connect, get together and leave a sort of footprint with protecting their privacy.

And I actually think that there is, and I might be just projecting a lot of things here, but I think that there's an opportunity here to do the same thing, to create a dating backend, if you will, with some sort of a client that actually allow people to connect, get together and leave a sort of footprint with protecting their privacy.

that can then infer and then other people who are building clients around it can then infer and use that, whether for other dating ideas as the backend graph for it, or actually for other types of connection that manifest in different ways.

that can then infer and then other people who are building clients around it can then infer and use that, whether for other dating ideas as the backend graph for it, or actually for other types of connection that manifest in different ways.

that can then infer and then other people who are building clients around it can then infer and use that, whether for other dating ideas as the backend graph for it, or actually for other types of connection that manifest in different ways.

And yeah. And just to nuance this, so it's not like, I don't think people, I think it's so emotionally indoted. So I don't think people should score other people. But what I do think is like, if there was no way for you to expose from privacy, everything is hashed and it's just like this technology called ZK proof.

And yeah. And just to nuance this, so it's not like, I don't think people, I think it's so emotionally indoted. So I don't think people should score other people. But what I do think is like, if there was no way for you to expose from privacy, everything is hashed and it's just like this technology called ZK proof.

And yeah. And just to nuance this, so it's not like, I don't think people, I think it's so emotionally indoted. So I don't think people should score other people. But what I do think is like, if there was no way for you to expose from privacy, everything is hashed and it's just like this technology called ZK proof.

But like, let's just say that the user doesn't see what's happening in the backend and their privacy is protected. you can tell that based on your previous matches, the likelihood for this person to respond in general or in this case is 10% and not 80%. What is the likelihood of this person to actually go on a date, on the second date, on the third date?

But like, let's just say that the user doesn't see what's happening in the backend and their privacy is protected. you can tell that based on your previous matches, the likelihood for this person to respond in general or in this case is 10% and not 80%. What is the likelihood of this person to actually go on a date, on the second date, on the third date?

But like, let's just say that the user doesn't see what's happening in the backend and their privacy is protected. you can tell that based on your previous matches, the likelihood for this person to respond in general or in this case is 10% and not 80%. What is the likelihood of this person to actually go on a date, on the second date, on the third date?

This is not we scoring one another, but this is just data as it is. Time to reply, time to follow up, the likelihood to do a first date and a second date, and actually allow local computations on a client based on other proofs to say, Look, Greg, here are 10 matches, like... We, nobody, no human ranked them.

This is not we scoring one another, but this is just data as it is. Time to reply, time to follow up, the likelihood to do a first date and a second date, and actually allow local computations on a client based on other proofs to say, Look, Greg, here are 10 matches, like... We, nobody, no human ranked them.

This is not we scoring one another, but this is just data as it is. Time to reply, time to follow up, the likelihood to do a first date and a second date, and actually allow local computations on a client based on other proofs to say, Look, Greg, here are 10 matches, like... We, nobody, no human ranked them.

This is just based on the matches you had before and you went on date and the matches they had before and went on date. The likelihood of you going to a second date with this person is 5%. And this other person, actually, if you have a first date, then the likelihood of you going to a third date is 90%. Where do you start?

This is just based on the matches you had before and you went on date and the matches they had before and went on date. The likelihood of you going to a second date with this person is 5%. And this other person, actually, if you have a first date, then the likelihood of you going to a third date is 90%. Where do you start?

This is just based on the matches you had before and you went on date and the matches they had before and went on date. The likelihood of you going to a second date with this person is 5%. And this other person, actually, if you have a first date, then the likelihood of you going to a third date is 90%. Where do you start?

You know, and, and I think these is not even one another just, um, given, given some

You know, and, and I think these is not even one another just, um, given, given some

You know, and, and I think these is not even one another just, um, given, given some