Ben Rubin

Cause like if somebody is selling ads somewhere and they're like, wait, wait, wait, can we pay? Can we pay to know? Like if somebody saw that ad and we, we take it like, what's the likelihood of them doing something completely random and something else somewhere else. They will pay also for that kind of information. Yeah.

Cause like if somebody is selling ads somewhere and they're like, wait, wait, wait, can we pay? Can we pay to know? Like if somebody saw that ad and we, we take it like, what's the likelihood of them doing something completely random and something else somewhere else. They will pay also for that kind of information. Yeah.

I'm trying to take it slow.

I'm trying to take it slow.

I'm trying to take it slow.

Yeah. The lookalike based on the... No, lookalike on the graph. No, for sure. Like, yeah.

Yeah. The lookalike based on the... No, lookalike on the graph. No, for sure. Like, yeah.

Yeah. The lookalike based on the... No, lookalike on the graph. No, for sure. Like, yeah.

They're selling watches with batteries? That's not real watches.

They're selling watches with batteries? That's not real watches.

They're selling watches with batteries? That's not real watches.

One of the thesis behind the protocol and the client that we're building, our protocol that we're building called River. And the idea is to create an end-to-end encrypted social messaging protocol that is essentially built on the graph of trust or the graph of motivation. And the bet is that the more there is off-chain proofs that are going on-chain

One of the thesis behind the protocol and the client that we're building, our protocol that we're building called River. And the idea is to create an end-to-end encrypted social messaging protocol that is essentially built on the graph of trust or the graph of motivation. And the bet is that the more there is off-chain proofs that are going on-chain

One of the thesis behind the protocol and the client that we're building, our protocol that we're building called River. And the idea is to create an end-to-end encrypted social messaging protocol that is essentially built on the graph of trust or the graph of motivation. And the bet is that the more there is off-chain proofs that are going on-chain

The more we can validate online in a way that is open and trustless, I guess, that somebody did the actions that they said they did, the more that we're creating a new graph that is around motivation and alignment of interest of what we stand to gain and lose. And that warrants a new type of communication product that is not organized around. I'm a watch salesman.

The more we can validate online in a way that is open and trustless, I guess, that somebody did the actions that they said they did, the more that we're creating a new graph that is around motivation and alignment of interest of what we stand to gain and lose. And that warrants a new type of communication product that is not organized around. I'm a watch salesman.

The more we can validate online in a way that is open and trustless, I guess, that somebody did the actions that they said they did, the more that we're creating a new graph that is around motivation and alignment of interest of what we stand to gain and lose. And that warrants a new type of communication product that is not organized around. I'm a watch salesman.

I sold a lot of watches and you're like, I'm a watch buyer. I bought a lot of watches. Therefore, we should all come to this forum and engage, which is not a good idea because one of you is going to lose their pants. Right. So. In the kind of.

I sold a lot of watches and you're like, I'm a watch buyer. I bought a lot of watches. Therefore, we should all come to this forum and engage, which is not a good idea because one of you is going to lose their pants. Right. So. In the kind of.

I sold a lot of watches and you're like, I'm a watch buyer. I bought a lot of watches. Therefore, we should all come to this forum and engage, which is not a good idea because one of you is going to lose their pants. Right. So. In the kind of.