Ben Shapiro

We destroyed their ballistic missile facilities.

It's not a permanent thing, but our allies have overwatch.

Okay, let's say that the United States has said, listen,

We're going to maintain these sanctions on Iran.

There won't be enough money for them to flow that money over to their terror proxies.

Status quo.

OK, and let's say that the United States had basically said with regard to the straight, we're just going to pull out and whether Iran tolls, whether Iran doesn't, you know.

Not great, but we're going to maintain our sanctions on companies that do business with Iranian ships.

Also, OK.

So, again, a bad deal is significantly worse than no deal.

Why?

Because of the final issue funding.

It turns out that the funding of Iran is not, in fact, contingent on Iran becoming a wonderful, reasonable actor in the region.

Not in the slightest.

One thing we should remember here is that even if they were to be reasonable for the next three years so that we stuff money in their pockets, unfrozen money into their pockets, they could, year four, just take all that money and do what they want with it.

This is one of the big problems with Obama's JCPOA.

If you toss money at a terror regime, they can wait and they can watch and then they can activate.

This is what the world tried to do with Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

hey, they're not doing anything that bad right now.

Sure, they fire rockets every so often, but if we stuff some billions in their pockets, probably it'll be fine.