Benjamin Netanyahu

The problem I have with that, as I mentioned earlier, just before we began the podcast, is that at a certain point, you want to put barriers to monopoly. And if you're a really able competitor, you're going to create a monopoly. That's what Peter Thiel says is a natural course of things. It's what I learned basically in the Boston Consulting Group.

The problem I have with that, as I mentioned earlier, just before we began the podcast, is that at a certain point, you want to put barriers to monopoly. And if you're a really able competitor, you're going to create a monopoly. That's what Peter Thiel says is a natural course of things. It's what I learned basically in the Boston Consulting Group.

The problem I have with that, as I mentioned earlier, just before we began the podcast, is that at a certain point, you want to put barriers to monopoly. And if you're a really able competitor, you're going to create a monopoly. That's what Peter Thiel says is a natural course of things. It's what I learned basically in the Boston Consulting Group.

If you're a very able competitor, you'll create scale advantages that give you the ability to lock out your competition. And as a prime minister, I want to assure that there is competition in the market, so you have to limit competition. limit this competitive power at a certain point. And that becomes increasingly hard in a world where everything is intermixed.

If you're a very able competitor, you'll create scale advantages that give you the ability to lock out your competition. And as a prime minister, I want to assure that there is competition in the market, so you have to limit competition. limit this competitive power at a certain point. And that becomes increasingly hard in a world where everything is intermixed.

If you're a very able competitor, you'll create scale advantages that give you the ability to lock out your competition. And as a prime minister, I want to assure that there is competition in the market, so you have to limit competition. limit this competitive power at a certain point. And that becomes increasingly hard in a world where everything is intermixed.

Where do you define market segments? Where do you define monopoly? How do you do that? That is very, that actually conceptually I find very challenging. Because of all the dozens of political, of economic reforms that I've made, the most difficult part is the conceptual part.

Where do you define market segments? Where do you define monopoly? How do you do that? That is very, that actually conceptually I find very challenging. Because of all the dozens of political, of economic reforms that I've made, the most difficult part is the conceptual part.

Where do you define market segments? Where do you define monopoly? How do you do that? That is very, that actually conceptually I find very challenging. Because of all the dozens of political, of economic reforms that I've made, the most difficult part is the conceptual part.

Once you've ironed it out, you say, here's what I want to do, here's the right thing to do, then you have a practical problem of overcoming union resistance, political resistance, press calumny, opponents from this or that corner. That's a practical matter. But if you have it conceptually defined, You can move ahead to reform economies or reform education or reform transportation. Fine.

Once you've ironed it out, you say, here's what I want to do, here's the right thing to do, then you have a practical problem of overcoming union resistance, political resistance, press calumny, opponents from this or that corner. That's a practical matter. But if you have it conceptually defined, You can move ahead to reform economies or reform education or reform transportation. Fine.

Once you've ironed it out, you say, here's what I want to do, here's the right thing to do, then you have a practical problem of overcoming union resistance, political resistance, press calumny, opponents from this or that corner. That's a practical matter. But if you have it conceptually defined, You can move ahead to reform economies or reform education or reform transportation. Fine.

And the question of the growing power of large companies, big tech companies to monopolize the markets because they're better at it. They provide a service. They provide it at lower cost, at rapidly declining cost. Where do you stop? Where do you stop in a monopoly power is a crucial question because it also becomes now a political question.

And the question of the growing power of large companies, big tech companies to monopolize the markets because they're better at it. They provide a service. They provide it at lower cost, at rapidly declining cost. Where do you stop? Where do you stop in a monopoly power is a crucial question because it also becomes now a political question.

And the question of the growing power of large companies, big tech companies to monopolize the markets because they're better at it. They provide a service. They provide it at lower cost, at rapidly declining cost. Where do you stop? Where do you stop in a monopoly power is a crucial question because it also becomes now a political question.

If you amass enormous amount of economic power, which is information power, You know, that also monopolizes the political process, which creates, these are real questions that are not obvious. I don't have an obvious answer. Because as I said, as a 19th century Democrat, these are questions of the 21st century, which people should begin to think, do you have a solution to that?

If you amass enormous amount of economic power, which is information power, You know, that also monopolizes the political process, which creates, these are real questions that are not obvious. I don't have an obvious answer. Because as I said, as a 19th century Democrat, these are questions of the 21st century, which people should begin to think, do you have a solution to that?

If you amass enormous amount of economic power, which is information power, You know, that also monopolizes the political process, which creates, these are real questions that are not obvious. I don't have an obvious answer. Because as I said, as a 19th century Democrat, these are questions of the 21st century, which people should begin to think, do you have a solution to that?

You know where to draw the line? It's not breaking up AT&T.

You know where to draw the line? It's not breaking up AT&T.