Benjamin Wittes

When you just look at this one case, am I crazy to say that in some ways the Trump Justice Department and what the immigrant – I mean we may say a violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th. I mean these are the amendments that are there to essentially put some boundaries on what the state can do to somebody that they think might be a criminal.

When you just look at this one case, am I crazy to say that in some ways the Trump Justice Department and what the immigrant – I mean we may say a violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th. I mean these are the amendments that are there to essentially put some boundaries on what the state can do to somebody that they think might be a criminal.

When you just look at this one case, am I crazy to say that in some ways the Trump Justice Department and what the immigrant – I mean we may say a violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th. I mean these are the amendments that are there to essentially put some boundaries on what the state can do to somebody that they think might be a criminal.

So it is – let's talk about the Supreme Court ruling here and the word they chose to use. The administration does not believe the Supreme Court has ordered them to have him returned. They believe that the Supreme Court simply said – and this is – I'm sort of interpreting based on what you wrote. You seem to think that their interpretation is –

So it is – let's talk about the Supreme Court ruling here and the word they chose to use. The administration does not believe the Supreme Court has ordered them to have him returned. They believe that the Supreme Court simply said – and this is – I'm sort of interpreting based on what you wrote. You seem to think that their interpretation is –

So it is – let's talk about the Supreme Court ruling here and the word they chose to use. The administration does not believe the Supreme Court has ordered them to have him returned. They believe that the Supreme Court simply said – and this is – I'm sort of interpreting based on what you wrote. You seem to think that their interpretation is –

If El Salvador chooses to send him back, the United States has to accept him.

If El Salvador chooses to send him back, the United States has to accept him.

If El Salvador chooses to send him back, the United States has to accept him.

And how do you interpret the Supreme Court order?

And how do you interpret the Supreme Court order?

And how do you interpret the Supreme Court order?

Do you believe the Supreme Court watered their order down?

Do you believe the Supreme Court watered their order down?

Do you believe the Supreme Court watered their order down?

This Supreme Court, would you... That's what I mean. Like, this is what you expected from this version of the Roberts Court, not what you would have expected from a generic Supreme Court on this issue?

This Supreme Court, would you... That's what I mean. Like, this is what you expected from this version of the Roberts Court, not what you would have expected from a generic Supreme Court on this issue?

This Supreme Court, would you... That's what I mean. Like, this is what you expected from this version of the Roberts Court, not what you would have expected from a generic Supreme Court on this issue?

And I don't know if it is for the most part. This court's been consistent on that. Yeah, very. They're very light on on the executive branch in general.

And I don't know if it is for the most part. This court's been consistent on that. Yeah, very. They're very light on on the executive branch in general.