Benjy (Benji Weiss?)

You're the party who should turn it over.

And this is what the court says.

The government's the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files.

By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a diversion from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession.

The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.

In February 2025, the government, as noted, was prepared to release the Epstein files to the public.

But then on July 6, 2025, the government announced it would not make the files available to the public.

Then it cites the memo, and it says, "...a significant and compelling reason to reject the government's position in this litigation..."

is that the government has already undertaken a comprehensive investigation into the epstein case and not surprisingly has assembled a trove of epstein documents interviews and exhibits as the government committed that it would share its epstein investigation material with the public i was at end the government committed it would share with the public the the federal judge here berman is saying release the files

It's not a debate.

That's what the judge wants.

So when he was like, oh, the judge said not to turn it over.

One of the other things that Kash Patel took the position was that Epstein never trafficked girls or women with any other men, that he was just a lone wolf.

What are you talking about?

And then he was pressed on it and he was like, yes, as it relates to the charged conduct, as it relates to the charged conduct.

OK, well, as it relates to the charged conduct, we know that only Epstein was charged and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The issue is, is that there was a cover up and more people should be charged.

We know that only one or two people were charged.

We get that.

So that, Brett, to your point, is how they think they're being sneaky, right?