Betül Kaçar

Because then you removed the randomness from the equation a little bit, right?

You just removed it, because you're assuming everything will happen at the same time, at the same intensity, so that's not too contingent.

that means that the natural selection you're thinking is really operating at more or evolution is operating at more under more random forces than that can be dictated by the environment so in our way of understanding or thinking about rewinding replaying I don't think we're thinking about the role of the environment as clearly or don't seem to be integrated as much but I'll

But we are not talking about whether life will emerge and sustain itself.

We are talking about whether life will emerge and sustain itself in the shape and form that is similar to what we have right now.

So you are chemistry, I'm chemistry.

We're having this conversation and your plants are chemistry too.

They're also having their own conversation.

I knew that.

I didn't want to say that, but they're fake.

What's wrong with this place?

Are you saying that you and I are the only living organisms?

Well, obviously there are microbes in this room.

Well, this is not a clean room.

So you have microbes here.

Yes.

So you and I and all the microbes in this room, your chemical systems that are operating in a way that we can respond and sense and our environments and whatnot.

But if you are asking if we are going to be here, then you're imagining that another solution is also possible, which is different.

than the fundamentals of life.

Because life will do always, life will do its life thing.