Blake
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Yeah, and now Dane County is about 50% in and Schimmel's down to 21%, which, again, you're knocking on the door. That's the floor. The floor for him is like 20%, 21%. We got to keep that up in order for things not to go completely haywire. Now it's 57%, and he's hanging in there at 21%. So you can't tap out yet on that.
Yeah, and now Dane County is about 50% in and Schimmel's down to 21%, which, again, you're knocking on the door. That's the floor. The floor for him is like 20%, 21%. We got to keep that up in order for things not to go completely haywire. Now it's 57%, and he's hanging in there at 21%. So you can't tap out yet on that.
We'll keep an eye on here with how the rest of this report comes out. Again, we're still hanging in there. Waukesha is now at 77%, still hanging at 58%, which is not enough. Waukesha has got to be at 62%, 63%, again, because of the size, the magnitude of the county. It's big enough where if you win by that much, which...
We'll keep an eye on here with how the rest of this report comes out. Again, we're still hanging in there. Waukesha is now at 77%, still hanging at 58%, which is not enough. Waukesha has got to be at 62%, 63%, again, because of the size, the magnitude of the county. It's big enough where if you win by that much, which...
waukesha used to win for conservatives by that much that is that is again the home of scott walker he lives he lives there not far in pewaukee pewaukee is one of the largest couch voter voting situations that we have we talked about with charlie the loss here isn't to the radical left the loss is to our own people not turning out and some of these wards we lost to the couch
waukesha used to win for conservatives by that much that is that is again the home of scott walker he lives he lives there not far in pewaukee pewaukee is one of the largest couch voter voting situations that we have we talked about with charlie the loss here isn't to the radical left the loss is to our own people not turning out and some of these wards we lost to the couch
Some of these wards just don't. They have thousands of people who don't show up for these votes.
Some of these wards just don't. They have thousands of people who don't show up for these votes.
Well, we know what the solution is. The solution that we had in Arizona was you have to put full-time bodies on the low prop voters. You have to have those people out for months and months and months and months. And you have to have enough people to be able to chase enough votes to win.
Well, we know what the solution is. The solution that we had in Arizona was you have to put full-time bodies on the low prop voters. You have to have those people out for months and months and months and months. And you have to have enough people to be able to chase enough votes to win.
The forecast right now is saying it's probably going to be in the ballpark of about 1.15, 1.16 million votes that are going to be cast.
The forecast right now is saying it's probably going to be in the ballpark of about 1.15, 1.16 million votes that are going to be cast.
again these are just project projections but 1.6 million votes uh sorry 1.16 million votes for Susan Crawford you've got to chase that many votes you've got to get out and this is much higher than people expected uh this this race is probably going to end up being over well over 2 million votes cast um you know our estimation was we needed 2.2 million votes cast we might come out slightly underneath that and that's
again these are just project projections but 1.6 million votes uh sorry 1.16 million votes for Susan Crawford you've got to chase that many votes you've got to get out and this is much higher than people expected uh this this race is probably going to end up being over well over 2 million votes cast um you know our estimation was we needed 2.2 million votes cast we might come out slightly underneath that and that's
Part of what's not going to help Brad Schimel is we didn't get enough election day turnout. But that is that is where you look at this and you go, OK, well, how do you get that many people out to vote? You've got to put that many bodies on that on those people. And there's simple math to it.
Part of what's not going to help Brad Schimel is we didn't get enough election day turnout. But that is that is where you look at this and you go, OK, well, how do you get that many people out to vote? You've got to put that many bodies on that on those people. And there's simple math to it.
What the left funds effectively one full time person to chase somewhere in the ballpark about three to four hundred votes. If you want to win, and again, there's unfortunately not enough exuberance for Supreme Court races from the right for donors to fund that many full-time bodies.
What the left funds effectively one full time person to chase somewhere in the ballpark about three to four hundred votes. If you want to win, and again, there's unfortunately not enough exuberance for Supreme Court races from the right for donors to fund that many full-time bodies.
But the difference here is probably going to be 150,000 votes, which, give or take, is another 500 full-time people you have on the ground. The left has those people already. And we know this because they have the unions. They give union workers time off. They already have the C4 set up. They pay them. Our side doesn't have that. So you have to build it. You have to fund it.
But the difference here is probably going to be 150,000 votes, which, give or take, is another 500 full-time people you have on the ground. The left has those people already. And we know this because they have the unions. They give union workers time off. They already have the C4 set up. They pay them. Our side doesn't have that. So you have to build it. You have to fund it.