Brendan Banfield

That was effective.

It was effective.

He said that Christine knew about two of his affairs, and he implied he had more than two, and that he knew about her affairs, and he explained how they worked in jobs where they had to be gone for long periods of time, and it's just what happened, but they went to marriage counseling.

So yes, it sounds like

him having an affair wouldn't be marriage ending.

So that takes away some of that issue or motive that you would think, well, yes, she's going to divorce me and then I'll lose my daughter.

So you're telling me he is so in love in six weeks with the 21-year-old au pair that he hatches a master plan to kill his wife.

And he said to that, quote from him,

That is absolutely crazy.

And when he said that is absolutely crazy, the way he set it up, I hadn't thought about it.

I didn't know that he had had prior affairs.

And I didn't know that they had only been in a sexual relationship for less than two months.

So again, the suggestion is that he was talking about marriage, their future with the au pair,

how the au pair was going to be the new mommy, and everything was going to be great.

And six weeks, and in order for this plan to happen, after six weeks, I'm so sure that I am going to do all of this stuff.

If you're talking about reasonable doubt and just a reasonable person, that just sounds like far-fetched.

Yes, I was like, as soon as he said it, I thought, damn, I get that.

That makes sense.

And I think we have heard from legal minds, people who know more about juries than we do, that when things just make sense, juries, that's what they bite on.

When things don't make sense, you're like, huh.