Bret Weinstein

Further trials of Ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted.

So here you have a trial that overwhelmingly shows ivermectin is effective.

It reduced the recovery time by a couple of days, even though they gave it super late, which with all antivirals makes them very much weaker than they would otherwise be.

And here they are reporting that the answer is it's unlikely to create meaningful outcomes and there's no further work needed.

OK, this is absurd.

This is the quality of trial that we're going to.

And what it does, this is them gaslighting us, right?

You and I said, look, the evidence suggests that this stuff works.

It's quite safe compared to almost any other drug you could take.

In fact, I can't think of one that's safer.

And that therefore, in light of the evidence that it seems to meaningfully improve outcomes, it's a good bet, right?

They mocked us over that conclusion.

This study makes it very clear that even when people are trying to hide that conclusion, that it's there in the data if you go looking.

Now, there's an even better one, though.

There is a

Have you read Pierre Corey's book, The War on Ivermectin?

No.

Okay.

There's something reported in this book that it really stops you in your tracks.

It is an accidental natural experiment.