Bret Weinstein

The accidental experiment that I described that the courts ran is incredibly powerful evidence.

The statistics are literally something that you can do on one sheet of paper, right?

This is the simplest conceivable test, the chi-square goodness of fit test.

There's no place for anything to hide.

Either the data is what it says it is,

Or it's not.

But if the data is what it says it is, then the result leaves no question whatsoever that ivermectin works in very sick people relative to an endpoint of death.

That's a very powerful kind of evidence.

You know, I was recently on a podcast called Why Should I Trust You with Pierre Corey.

Actually, we were at the CHD conference in this podcast.

It is a great name for a podcast.

And actually, I loved the podcast.

The podcast was we didn't really know what we were sitting down to.

But it was Pierre and me talking to three allopathic doctors and a host there.

And the allopathic doctors were curious about the medical freedom movement, but they certainly weren't on board with this.

And Pierre and I told them about the accidental experiment run by the courts, the natural experiment.

And it was clear that these doctors...

couldn't grasp the significance of the evidence, right?

It's too mind-blowing that this very simple circumstance reveals the overwhelming power of this drug.

And it was like, well, that can't be right.