Bret Weinstein

Yeah.

And so the fact that we see exactly the inverse means that actually the result, if there's any bias at all, is probably conservative.

Right.

It's probably more effective than we think.

Right.

So in any case, I just think we've forgotten how science works.

Right.

It doesn't take any all of the money and.

The complexity of running one of these multi-arm trials is huge.

And yet an accidental experiment run by the courts gives you a powerful result like this that tells you without a doubt that this is effective, which is actually what you find when you go and look at all these trials that attempted to sabotage ivermectin and you discover that actually, you know, they're playing games.

They're telling you, let me give you an example.

you can create the impression that a drug doesn't work by setting an unrealistic endpoint, right?

Like if I, let's say that I had a drug that was perfectly successful at stopping the common cold, right?

You take it and one day later your common cold is gone, okay?

And I decide to run an experiment

But the endpoint of the experiment is hospitalization, right?

And I say, okay, was there any difference in how hospitalized the patients who got my drug are versus those who didn't?

Well, no.

Nobody goes to the hospital over a cold.

So the point is it makes the drug look totally ineffective.