Bret Weinstein

That I don't know.

But my feeling, it could be.

Oh, and this is another thing that people need to understand about it.

We are way too focused on myocarditis and pericarditis.

This is a random, maybe not random, haphazard tissue-destroying technology, the platform itself.

It's like rolling the dice on destroying cells.

There are cells in your body you can afford to lose, and there are other cells in the body that you can't afford to lose.

And if you take a bunch of boosters, each time you take one, you're rolling the dice on losing a bunch of cells that you may or may not be able to afford losing.

So the fact that that includes things in the nervous system, well, of course it does.

It's completely haphazard.

So anyway, what I don't get is somebody who obviously believes in

Rigorous thought must believe in correcting their course when they've got something wrong.

That's the key to rigorous analytical thought.

And yet in this case, he appears, I mean, ironically enough, coming from Sam, it's faith.

He has faith that whatever he said must have been right, even if he has to do that little trick he does where it's like, well, if the facts had been different, then I would have been right.

That thing was crazy.

And again, you could be on the same level with all the people who got it more right than you if you were simply decent about what it meant to disagree.

Oh, the people who are angriest at him are people who were devoted fans of his.

I don't know if he even knows that.

Yeah, he's stuck.