Bret Weinstein

Like, if the idea was to make money, I don't know why they delivered such a dangerous shot.

seems to me, and I've wondered a lot about this, if they had delivered an inert shot, I don't know what world we'd be living in today.

Because they could have pretended that it was highly effective, that it saved us from the terrible disease, that those of us who worried about the technology were wrong.

They could have used their statistical shenanigans to pretend that anything had happened

And they seem to me to have screwed up having delivered a shot dangerous enough that we can all detect the safety signal among our friends, right?

So that raises the question to me, did they not understand?

that it was as dangerous as it was?

I don't think that can be true.

Based on what we know from Robert Malone about the history of this technology, they didn't think it was safe.

So is there something important about injecting people with it?

Do they want people actually injected with the thing?

That's not consistent with the argument that they were just trying to make money, right?

Because blanks would have been

safe, not effective, but what they gave us wasn't effective.

What was the purpose of injecting people with a contaminated, dangerous, novel platform, so-called vaccine?

DNA, yeah.

I think they knew.

Yes, they had to know that it was contaminated.

Okay, but if we're going to talk about the money, then we have to put the money in the proper context.

Okay.