Brian Buckmeyer

You've got a little bit of inside baseball here because you've gone up against Mark Ignifilo and Tenny Garagos. And now the SDNY is going up against who I would describe as the lead defense attorneys at Sean Combs. So what can we expect of their style? What can we expect of the way they're going to cross-examine?

What can we expect of the closing arguments that the defense is likely going to bring up since you know their style of defense?

What can we expect of the closing arguments that the defense is likely going to bring up since you know their style of defense?

What can we expect of the closing arguments that the defense is likely going to bring up since you know their style of defense?

In your case against Keith Raniere, you had an expert forensic psychologist by the name of Don Hughes, who also testified in Sean Combs' case. How did you use her expertise to help in that case, and how do you see her expertise being used to further the government's case against Sean Combs?

In your case against Keith Raniere, you had an expert forensic psychologist by the name of Don Hughes, who also testified in Sean Combs' case. How did you use her expertise to help in that case, and how do you see her expertise being used to further the government's case against Sean Combs?

In your case against Keith Raniere, you had an expert forensic psychologist by the name of Don Hughes, who also testified in Sean Combs' case. How did you use her expertise to help in that case, and how do you see her expertise being used to further the government's case against Sean Combs?

So the interesting thing that I found with this case, which also happened in Keith Raniere's case, was that the defense had the argument of some of this was consensual or all of this was consensual as a way of defending their case.

So the interesting thing that I found with this case, which also happened in Keith Raniere's case, was that the defense had the argument of some of this was consensual or all of this was consensual as a way of defending their case.

So the interesting thing that I found with this case, which also happened in Keith Raniere's case, was that the defense had the argument of some of this was consensual or all of this was consensual as a way of defending their case.

What kind of difficulties does that create for the government in terms of trying to prove their case that either consent didn't happen or it doesn't matter in the context of these allegations?

What kind of difficulties does that create for the government in terms of trying to prove their case that either consent didn't happen or it doesn't matter in the context of these allegations?

What kind of difficulties does that create for the government in terms of trying to prove their case that either consent didn't happen or it doesn't matter in the context of these allegations?

How do you prepare alleged victims to testify in court, considering all of what's going to happen in the direct examination, showing up to court, and especially the cross-examination?

How do you prepare alleged victims to testify in court, considering all of what's going to happen in the direct examination, showing up to court, and especially the cross-examination?

How do you prepare alleged victims to testify in court, considering all of what's going to happen in the direct examination, showing up to court, and especially the cross-examination?

Moira, thank you so much for your time.

Moira, thank you so much for your time.

Moira, thank you so much for your time.

Court's taking somewhat of a longer break for Memorial Day weekend. They're off today on Friday and resume on Tuesday, May 27th. We'll be back in your feed later that day with the latest from ABC News Live's Burden of Proof. If you have any questions about the case you'd like me to answer, call and leave a voicemail at 929-388-1249. Thanks to everyone who's called.