Brian Fitzgibbons

I think that they still want to try to find signals from the pacemaker.

If it's still active, they could be up doing that again.

Again, they would be doing something more patterned.

But if they had specific information about a location, they may have wanted to get down there in the air right away to try to see if they could get the signal.

Yeah, so there'd been some work done on these antennas to increase the range of that signal sniffer up to 150 to 300 feet in some test cases that I saw online.

So I believe that some of that technology had been deployed earlier on in this case to broaden the scope of that search.

Of course, I agree that January 11th is an important date.

And we know this as fact at this point.

The FBI went door to door.

Mr. Lamee, your guest yesterday, corroborated that, looking for information about January 11th.

So the fact that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is saying that that date doesn't necessarily mean anything, I don't understand that statement.

That date is clearly important and connected to this case.

Well, I think with the technology we've got today, they can do a lot to identify what it possibly was.

If it was a car, maybe they can outline the lens and try to figure out what it is.

But at the altitude that it's at, it's probably, as you're suggesting,

the construction site, something down the street, because it doesn't look low enough to be at the street level.

So it's probably coming from that construction site.

But they can do a lot to make it look better and try to figure out what it is.

But again, like I said yesterday, why didn't they notice this earlier?

Why was this not something that they looked at?