Brian Maucere

At the end of the day, one thing we have in common is we all have human

you know, human emotions and fears and there's an innate protect mechanism.

I think most people have to sort of circle the wagons a bit and AI can definitely, definitely feel like it's coming after you in a lot of ways.

Do you think for like these people

I guess it's generalized, but I just wonder about these mathematicians.

I happen to be looking because it was on that same article about Gemini Deep Think.

They have three examples on here.

Lisa Carbone.

Now, I don't know her, okay, but she's a mathematician at Rutgers University.

Works on the mathematical structures required by high-energy physics community

to bridge the gap between Einstein's theory of gravity and quantum mechanics.

In a field with very little existing training data, she used DeepThink to review a highly technical mathematics paper.

DeepThink successfully identified a subtle logic flaw that had previously passed through human peer review unnoticed.

Now, I only bring her, I don't know her, but I only bring her up as one of many, many examples.

Do you think these scientists, because of just working in the scientific method and working towards breakthroughs,

are leaning into these AI tools?

Or is it a bit of maybe circle the wagons and maybe it's a bit of both?

Maybe this is a great conundrum episode.

People are people.

And I think even your greatest scientists might feel like, what does this mean about me if this AI can now do something that maybe I was in the...