Podcast Appearances
And so he reached out to Elon Musk and kind of mimicked this language and was able to sort of use that concern as a lightning rod to get some interest and power and momentum into AI in general.
And then from there, it's hard to walk away from that narrative.
You see that the more you talk about it, that it does affect investors.
It does sort of compel people to pay attention.
It does get headlines.
And so I think it does sort of balloon on and on and out.
So some of these guys, I think like Dario Amadei, I am sure he's legitimately concerned about all of this stuff.
Is his marketing department aware that he can win a round of headlines by expressing that concern in the release of Mythos?
Of course they are.
So they present every sort of white paper, every released or unreleased model, you know, with the same sort of level of gravity as though it were sort of, you know, a new set of promotional materials.
And so it becomes difficult to distinguish between the two.
But I would say it is yes and both.
And now we're in this pickle where the AI industry can't really walk away from its promise that has attracted so much investment in the first place.
They can't say, you know what, we're not going to automate all the jobs.
Right.
well, then what was that $30 billion for, right?
You know, so it really, we're sort of up on the brink and the precipice here.
And I think Bradley was absolutely right.
You know, it's not just the politicians, it's also the AI industry, you know, Meta and OpenAI and all these guys are bankrolling, you know, PACs right now to the tune of $100 million to sort of influence elections.
They supported the moratorium to ban state-level AI lawmaking, so the very least they could do