Brian Stelter

The public media funding fight is maybe one of the least dramatic examples of what is a really dramatic attempt to stifle the free press.

In his second term, he's trying to translate those words into actions. He is not just bullying the press, but in some cases taking actions against the press. And we may just be at the beginning stages of those actions.

In his second term, he's trying to translate those words into actions. He is not just bullying the press, but in some cases taking actions against the press. And we may just be at the beginning stages of those actions.

In his second term, he's trying to translate those words into actions. He is not just bullying the press, but in some cases taking actions against the press. And we may just be at the beginning stages of those actions.

What I see President Trump and his allies doing are looking for every conceivable pressure point against the American news media and then applying as much pressure as possible. We're seeing that on every front, from FCC investigations to much more intense hostility on social media. Journalists are not meant to be popular.

What I see President Trump and his allies doing are looking for every conceivable pressure point against the American news media and then applying as much pressure as possible. We're seeing that on every front, from FCC investigations to much more intense hostility on social media. Journalists are not meant to be popular.

What I see President Trump and his allies doing are looking for every conceivable pressure point against the American news media and then applying as much pressure as possible. We're seeing that on every front, from FCC investigations to much more intense hostility on social media. Journalists are not meant to be popular.

You're always going to tick off powerful people who don't like to see their favorite politician be questioned, be scrutinized, be interrogated. But one of the roles of journalism is to be that dissenting voice, showing up on behalf of the public and holding politicians of all parties accountable.

You're always going to tick off powerful people who don't like to see their favorite politician be questioned, be scrutinized, be interrogated. But one of the roles of journalism is to be that dissenting voice, showing up on behalf of the public and holding politicians of all parties accountable.

You're always going to tick off powerful people who don't like to see their favorite politician be questioned, be scrutinized, be interrogated. But one of the roles of journalism is to be that dissenting voice, showing up on behalf of the public and holding politicians of all parties accountable.

Well, if some bend the knee, others have to stand up straighter. You know, the former Time magazine editor Richard Sengel said this morning, Trump has sued dozens of publications and media outlets in the past trying to, quote, intimidate the press into self-censorship, not to actually win any particular case. He did win in this case with a big payment.

Well, if some bend the knee, others have to stand up straighter. You know, the former Time magazine editor Richard Sengel said this morning, Trump has sued dozens of publications and media outlets in the past trying to, quote, intimidate the press into self-censorship, not to actually win any particular case. He did win in this case with a big payment.

Well, if some bend the knee, others have to stand up straighter. You know, the former Time magazine editor Richard Sengel said this morning, Trump has sued dozens of publications and media outlets in the past trying to, quote, intimidate the press into self-censorship, not to actually win any particular case. He did win in this case with a big payment.

But that broader concern about self-censorship is one that I know many viewers and readers are worried about. And ultimately, Jim, as you know, we work for them. We work for the viewers.

But that broader concern about self-censorship is one that I know many viewers and readers are worried about. And ultimately, Jim, as you know, we work for them. We work for the viewers.

But that broader concern about self-censorship is one that I know many viewers and readers are worried about. And ultimately, Jim, as you know, we work for them. We work for the viewers.