Bridget McCormack

Because I don't think so.

No, not at all.

Yeah.

But I mean, so imagine, you know, disputes between those two that could be resolved instead of taking two years.

So somebody is waiting for their insurance company to tell the hospital that they're going to cover their treatment and they're dead before they get an answer.

Imagine if we could just resolve those right away, but in a system that transparently shows its work independently.

and shows its audits, right?

You tell me.

My guess is some people would say, like, I'll take that tomorrow, right?

I'm waiting for my treatment.

Yes, please send my dispute to an arbitration process that is transparent and shows its work.

Great.

Yeah.

Yeah, some people would.

And as I'm sure you know, there are lots of things that happen in public dispute resolution systems or in arbitration processes where the results are reported where there's not a lot of transparency.

Do you understand how judges come to the conclusions they come to?

We don't get to see the reasoning that goes on in their brain.

There's no requirement that the judge...

shows her work and how she got from step A to step D. You know, what was her thought process?

I mean, there is a, hopefully, you know, most judges are supposed to write opinions that should show some of that.