Bridget McCormack

I mean, you know, what do you even do with that?

So if you think that the human beings who get tired, who get hungry, who like all of us come to the table with cognitive biases are getting every single thing right, then you have a lot more trust in the public justice system than I think most people do.

His name was- It was worth a shot.

Go ahead.

Yeah, I mean, I think that's a completely fair point.

And again, I go back to, you know, where I believe disputes should be decided publicly.

And I think that should be true no matter how excellent.

I mean, eventually, probably the judges should be using some tech to help them make sure they don't make mistakes that

will undermine accountability and undermine trust.

But not all disputes are created equal, Nilay.

I mean, we all have lots of disputes that some of which we just think like, well, I don't even have the time or the energy or the resources to get that one resolved.

But if we did, if you could really resolve every dispute, if every human being could have a will or, you know, a plan for,

what happens if they become incapacitated or die, if every small business could plan for the disruptions that befall every small business, we'd have a better world.

I mean, disputes are not great, right?

They make a mess of economic relationships.

They make a mess of personal relationships.

And resolving them, in fact, does lead to more peace,

more stability, more economic growth, if that's your thing.

Resolving disputes is good.

Right now, we do not have any way to resolve most disputes because our one-to-one, bespoke, built-in 1776 system