Bryn Hall

Hata, it's a great thing, isn't it?

We can talk about it as analysts after a game.

And it's quite funny, over here in Japan, there's been a few decisions in it around penalties and one team winning the game and then one team losing the game.

So, look, to be honest, Ross, when I saw it, yes, I think you say that now.

And I probably do agree at the time.

I was like, this is a really good title.

If they do get a try here, I think it's going to be too hard for this Crusaders side for the rest of the game.

But, you know, going out to eight points, you know, you've still got to score a try and a penalty.

Like...

I didn't think it shouldn't have been that big of a deal where it probably cost them the game.

Now, after that decision from the penalty, that's where they probably lost the game.

The domino effects that fell post that.

But yeah, I thought eight points, to be honest, I didn't think it was a bad decision in the end going out to two scores.

They had to score two scores anyway for the Crusaders.

There was just a couple of moments post that that the Crusaders were able to implement and execute under pressure to be able to give themselves to win.

I think the biggest thing from this Ross was that even from that 50-22, the Crusaders have a line out five meters out.

They do an overthrow.

And then from that, the Chiefs had the ability to be able to exit the ball, kick it long.

kick it 60, 70 metres down the foot and the Crusaders have to attack.

But they got a knock on and then from that, they end up scoring a try.