Caller 10

And we're talking about a mix of medication records from pharmacies, lab testing records, genomic data from people who like go to the, you Data taken by the VA, data taken by the Indian Health Service, as well as data from private insurers. And they're also going to be buying data from smartwatches, from stuff like Fitbits, right?

And we're talking about a mix of medication records from pharmacies, lab testing records, genomic data from people who like go to the, you Data taken by the VA, data taken by the Indian Health Service, as well as data from private insurers. And they're also going to be buying data from smartwatches, from stuff like Fitbits, right?

And we're talking about a mix of medication records from pharmacies, lab testing records, genomic data from people who like go to the, you Data taken by the VA, data taken by the Indian Health Service, as well as data from private insurers. And they're also going to be buying data from smartwatches, from stuff like Fitbits, right?

Who does sell their data to anybody with like $20 hanging out the back of their pocket. And as a heads up, if you are looking for a fitness tracker, you should look more into this. There are a few that have reasonably good data protection histories. Garmin is one of them. This does not mean it's perfect. All of them will hand over your data if given a court order to do so.

Who does sell their data to anybody with like $20 hanging out the back of their pocket. And as a heads up, if you are looking for a fitness tracker, you should look more into this. There are a few that have reasonably good data protection histories. Garmin is one of them. This does not mean it's perfect. All of them will hand over your data if given a court order to do so.

Who does sell their data to anybody with like $20 hanging out the back of their pocket. And as a heads up, if you are looking for a fitness tracker, you should look more into this. There are a few that have reasonably good data protection histories. Garmin is one of them. This does not mean it's perfect. All of them will hand over your data if given a court order to do so.

None of them are going to break the law to hold onto your data. But Garmin doesn't just like sell willy-nilly to anybody who wants to like advertise based on it, right? That said, most of them do. The last thing I'd write was something like 12 out of 15 different free fitness tracking apps they checked sold data pretty widely. Yeah, about 80%. Yeah, it's the vast majority, right? Yeah.

None of them are going to break the law to hold onto your data. But Garmin doesn't just like sell willy-nilly to anybody who wants to like advertise based on it, right? That said, most of them do. The last thing I'd write was something like 12 out of 15 different free fitness tracking apps they checked sold data pretty widely. Yeah, about 80%. Yeah, it's the vast majority, right? Yeah.

None of them are going to break the law to hold onto your data. But Garmin doesn't just like sell willy-nilly to anybody who wants to like advertise based on it, right? That said, most of them do. The last thing I'd write was something like 12 out of 15 different free fitness tracking apps they checked sold data pretty widely. Yeah, about 80%. Yeah, it's the vast majority, right? Yeah.

So the NIH is basically looking at taking the data that exists. They're not talking about really gathering new data, but they are talking about collecting everything that exists and putting it under one roof for the first time. And this is for a couple of purposes, right? They want to be able to track the spread of different illnesses and different health problems within the population.

So the NIH is basically looking at taking the data that exists. They're not talking about really gathering new data, but they are talking about collecting everything that exists and putting it under one roof for the first time. And this is for a couple of purposes, right? They want to be able to track the spread of different illnesses and different health problems within the population.

So the NIH is basically looking at taking the data that exists. They're not talking about really gathering new data, but they are talking about collecting everything that exists and putting it under one roof for the first time. And this is for a couple of purposes, right? They want to be able to track the spread of different illnesses and different health problems within the population.

These are their claims. But also... They want to create a disease registry specifically to track Americans with autism, right? And this is because Kennedy describes autism as a preventable disease, which is not accurate. And the fact that this database and these other databases are being made should be very worrisome, right?

These are their claims. But also... They want to create a disease registry specifically to track Americans with autism, right? And this is because Kennedy describes autism as a preventable disease, which is not accurate. And the fact that this database and these other databases are being made should be very worrisome, right?

These are their claims. But also... They want to create a disease registry specifically to track Americans with autism, right? And this is because Kennedy describes autism as a preventable disease, which is not accurate. And the fact that this database and these other databases are being made should be very worrisome, right?

It's both important to talk about the fact that he is specifically signaling out autism while also stating like that's not the only thing they're looking into, right? They want data on people who are on SSRIs, who are on ADHD medication. They probably want data on drug use, right? There are a lot of things they are looking to be gathering, and none of it is shit that they should have access for.

It's both important to talk about the fact that he is specifically signaling out autism while also stating like that's not the only thing they're looking into, right? They want data on people who are on SSRIs, who are on ADHD medication. They probably want data on drug use, right? There are a lot of things they are looking to be gathering, and none of it is shit that they should have access for.

It's both important to talk about the fact that he is specifically signaling out autism while also stating like that's not the only thing they're looking into, right? They want data on people who are on SSRIs, who are on ADHD medication. They probably want data on drug use, right? There are a lot of things they are looking to be gathering, and none of it is shit that they should have access for.

Yes.

Yes.