Calley Means

So this... Do they all... Yeah, do they all get that?

Well, we talk a lot, the genetic arguments brought up a lot, and obviously, did genetics change in the last 50 years as obesity has absolutely taken over our country? But gene expression changes, right? So I think that's the thing that happens.

Well, we talk a lot, the genetic arguments brought up a lot, and obviously, did genetics change in the last 50 years as obesity has absolutely taken over our country? But gene expression changes, right? So I think that's the thing that happens.

Well, we talk a lot, the genetic arguments brought up a lot, and obviously, did genetics change in the last 50 years as obesity has absolutely taken over our country? But gene expression changes, right? So I think that's the thing that happens.

And I agree, Kelly. But they could change if that child is provided a whole food diet. That's right. Epigenetic changes can be reversed. Is exposed to sunlight.

And I agree, Kelly. But they could change if that child is provided a whole food diet. That's right. Epigenetic changes can be reversed. Is exposed to sunlight.

And I agree, Kelly. But they could change if that child is provided a whole food diet. That's right. Epigenetic changes can be reversed. Is exposed to sunlight.

So we have an Orwellian situation where we have such a crisis in America that children are in utero developing metabolic dysfunction because we're being, our food is so toxic and we've had a sedentary lifestyle and aren't looking at the sunlight and being, you know, sleeping, dysregulated sleeping, chronic stress with our phones.

So we have an Orwellian situation where we have such a crisis in America that children are in utero developing metabolic dysfunction because we're being, our food is so toxic and we've had a sedentary lifestyle and aren't looking at the sunlight and being, you know, sleeping, dysregulated sleeping, chronic stress with our phones.

So we have an Orwellian situation where we have such a crisis in America that children are in utero developing metabolic dysfunction because we're being, our food is so toxic and we've had a sedentary lifestyle and aren't looking at the sunlight and being, you know, sleeping, dysregulated sleeping, chronic stress with our phones.

So we have such a bad metabolic health environment that we have an epidemic of kids being born, you know, born with metabolic dysfunction. So it is societally vital. There's nothing more important than this. So we have an opportunity. It's not a both-and.

So we have such a bad metabolic health environment that we have an epidemic of kids being born, you know, born with metabolic dysfunction. So it is societally vital. There's nothing more important than this. So we have an opportunity. It's not a both-and.

So we have such a bad metabolic health environment that we have an epidemic of kids being born, you know, born with metabolic dysfunction. So it is societally vital. There's nothing more important than this. So we have an opportunity. It's not a both-and.

Are we going to, as a matter of public policy and as a matter of focus in that country, change that dynamic of changing our USDA guidelines to say that that two-year-old shouldn't be eating sugar? When you go the route of Ozempic, when you go the route that this is so bad that we need to jab those children at six. That's a different route. That's a different prioritization. It's not both hands.

Are we going to, as a matter of public policy and as a matter of focus in that country, change that dynamic of changing our USDA guidelines to say that that two-year-old shouldn't be eating sugar? When you go the route of Ozempic, when you go the route that this is so bad that we need to jab those children at six. That's a different route. That's a different prioritization. It's not both hands.

Are we going to, as a matter of public policy and as a matter of focus in that country, change that dynamic of changing our USDA guidelines to say that that two-year-old shouldn't be eating sugar? When you go the route of Ozempic, when you go the route that this is so bad that we need to jab those children at six. That's a different route. That's a different prioritization. It's not both hands.

But if we agree with the idea, if we actually agree with the science and that this drug is good and should be used as a standard of care, why not? I don't think any drug is good or bad.

But if we agree with the idea, if we actually agree with the science and that this drug is good and should be used as a standard of care, why not? I don't think any drug is good or bad.

But if we agree with the idea, if we actually agree with the science and that this drug is good and should be used as a standard of care, why not? I don't think any drug is good or bad.

Who is the right person, just generically? I'm just curious. Well, that's a great question.