Carol Masser

Absolutely.

In fact, it was not just a theoretical pledge.

It's something we had to practice for the past three years now to physically demonstrate we have the ability to ensure the safety and security of these advanced technologies from the U.S.

that there's no possibility for that technology to be passed on elsewhere.

It cannot be transshipped.

There's no backdoor for remote access by unapproved parties, so on and so forth.

I think there are three probably major factors to cause concern or doubt or even fear in this global AI movement.

One is that it's clear now, as we discussed earlier, AI has entered our societies.

AI is demonstrating it potentially can do many things humans are doing today.

So job security is one concern.

That's number one.

Number two, as we have seen, AI does require so much electricity

Especially in the U.S., there are such debates already.

Can these data centers eventually take power away from people who need it to be left in the cold and have AI consume all the power?

This is power concern number two.

Number three really is the concern about security.

A global race.

Can we be actually left behind?

And what this means for government, for national security.

I think all these are factors to cause certain pockets in the U.S.