Carole Hemmelgarn

You described this as the individual chooses to violate a prescribed process or practice. Now, I could imagine there are some cases where people violate because they think that the process is wrong.

After sabotage on the spectrum comes inattention.

After sabotage on the spectrum comes inattention.

After sabotage on the spectrum comes inattention.

Now, it sounds like those are mostly blameworthy, but what about inattention caused by external factors?

Now, it sounds like those are mostly blameworthy, but what about inattention caused by external factors?

Now, it sounds like those are mostly blameworthy, but what about inattention caused by external factors?

Can you think of a large-scale failure, a corporate or institutional failure that was caused largely by inattention?

Can you think of a large-scale failure, a corporate or institutional failure that was caused largely by inattention?

Can you think of a large-scale failure, a corporate or institutional failure that was caused largely by inattention?

And was that change done to save money or was it even more benign than that?

And was that change done to save money or was it even more benign than that?

And was that change done to save money or was it even more benign than that?

Wow, wow, wow, wow. That's a great example. Okay, let's go to the next one. Inability. I'm reading one version of your spectrum here, which describes this as the individual lacks the knowledge, attitude, skills, or perceptions required to execute a task. That's quite a portfolio of potential failure.

Wow, wow, wow, wow. That's a great example. Okay, let's go to the next one. Inability. I'm reading one version of your spectrum here, which describes this as the individual lacks the knowledge, attitude, skills, or perceptions required to execute a task. That's quite a portfolio of potential failure.

Wow, wow, wow, wow. That's a great example. Okay, let's go to the next one. Inability. I'm reading one version of your spectrum here, which describes this as the individual lacks the knowledge, attitude, skills, or perceptions required to execute a task. That's quite a portfolio of potential failure.

This reminds me of the Peter Principle where people get promoted to a position higher than they're capable based on their past experience, but their past experience may not have been so relevant to this.

This reminds me of the Peter Principle where people get promoted to a position higher than they're capable based on their past experience, but their past experience may not have been so relevant to this.

This reminds me of the Peter Principle where people get promoted to a position higher than they're capable based on their past experience, but their past experience may not have been so relevant to this.

I sometimes think about this in the political realm, too. The ability to get elected and the ability to govern effectively seem to be almost uncorrelated to me. I'm sorry to say. Do you think that's the case and do you apply this spectrum sometimes to the political realm? I don't think it was always the case.