Caroline Adams Miller
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Oh, if you take the first definition of SMART goals and you make are realistic, that immediately undermines goal setting theory. Red flags started to fly in my brain in 2005 when I saw that challenging and specific goals, learning goals and performance goals, they have to be challenging and specific if you want the best possible outcome.
Oh, if you take the first definition of SMART goals and you make are realistic, that immediately undermines goal setting theory. Red flags started to fly in my brain in 2005 when I saw that challenging and specific goals, learning goals and performance goals, they have to be challenging and specific if you want the best possible outcome.
Using the word realistic immediately causes you to set what's called low goals. So forget smart goals, buy my book and learn the real science, period.
Using the word realistic immediately causes you to set what's called low goals. So forget smart goals, buy my book and learn the real science, period.
Using the word realistic immediately causes you to set what's called low goals. So forget smart goals, buy my book and learn the real science, period.
I think it's really important that we look at this. And again, I don't think this question has really been asked or addressed ever in a book. And it just struck me in February because I signed the contract last December and the book was turned in May 1st. So and it's out November 27. So this was huge. And in February, as I literally drowned 14, 16 hours a day.
I think it's really important that we look at this. And again, I don't think this question has really been asked or addressed ever in a book. And it just struck me in February because I signed the contract last December and the book was turned in May 1st. So and it's out November 27. So this was huge. And in February, as I literally drowned 14, 16 hours a day.
I think it's really important that we look at this. And again, I don't think this question has really been asked or addressed ever in a book. And it just struck me in February because I signed the contract last December and the book was turned in May 1st. So and it's out November 27. So this was huge. And in February, as I literally drowned 14, 16 hours a day.
I realized one day that all I had listened to that day or that week were what I call dude podcasts. I'd heard nothing but men talking about men to men about success and goal setting and motivation. And I realized that I hadn't heard a single woman even referenced as an example of excellence or curiosity or genius. The criteria for being a genius are skewed against women.
I realized one day that all I had listened to that day or that week were what I call dude podcasts. I'd heard nothing but men talking about men to men about success and goal setting and motivation. And I realized that I hadn't heard a single woman even referenced as an example of excellence or curiosity or genius. The criteria for being a genius are skewed against women.
I realized one day that all I had listened to that day or that week were what I call dude podcasts. I'd heard nothing but men talking about men to men about success and goal setting and motivation. And I realized that I hadn't heard a single woman even referenced as an example of excellence or curiosity or genius. The criteria for being a genius are skewed against women.
And that's when I realized that self-efficacy theory, Bandura's theory, where you have to have relatable role models, was working subconsciously and unconsciously against anybody who didn't fit that model of mostly white men, because face it, they've been in leadership, they've had the power forever. That's not debatable, really.
And that's when I realized that self-efficacy theory, Bandura's theory, where you have to have relatable role models, was working subconsciously and unconsciously against anybody who didn't fit that model of mostly white men, because face it, they've been in leadership, they've had the power forever. That's not debatable, really.
And that's when I realized that self-efficacy theory, Bandura's theory, where you have to have relatable role models, was working subconsciously and unconsciously against anybody who didn't fit that model of mostly white men, because face it, they've been in leadership, they've had the power forever. That's not debatable, really.
That listening to podcasts, reading these books, for the most part, you weren't going to hear or see relatable role models. And I began to ask myself, Are we, and I'm a woman, are we by and large setting smaller goals because of how the world seems to be skewed against us? We don't hear or see relatable role models.
That listening to podcasts, reading these books, for the most part, you weren't going to hear or see relatable role models. And I began to ask myself, Are we, and I'm a woman, are we by and large setting smaller goals because of how the world seems to be skewed against us? We don't hear or see relatable role models.
That listening to podcasts, reading these books, for the most part, you weren't going to hear or see relatable role models. And I began to ask myself, Are we, and I'm a woman, are we by and large setting smaller goals because of how the world seems to be skewed against us? We don't hear or see relatable role models.
Wikipedia says that 18% of the biographies are of women, 82% are of men, because there's this drive by editing that says women haven't been notable or noteworthy enough, so they delete their bios. So that's just one aspect is what are we hearing and seeing? And for the most part, it's dude walls, dude panels, but now dude podcasts, which is mostly how women get a lot of information.
Wikipedia says that 18% of the biographies are of women, 82% are of men, because there's this drive by editing that says women haven't been notable or noteworthy enough, so they delete their bios. So that's just one aspect is what are we hearing and seeing? And for the most part, it's dude walls, dude panels, but now dude podcasts, which is mostly how women get a lot of information.
Wikipedia says that 18% of the biographies are of women, 82% are of men, because there's this drive by editing that says women haven't been notable or noteworthy enough, so they delete their bios. So that's just one aspect is what are we hearing and seeing? And for the most part, it's dude walls, dude panels, but now dude podcasts, which is mostly how women get a lot of information.